You heard wrong, way wrong.

 

I don't think so.

Did they award a technical foul? If so, my only question would be if it wasn't intentional or flagrant, why the tech? And who was the player that committed it?

Did they award a technical foul? If so, my only question would be if it wasn't intentional or flagrant, why the tech? And who was the player that committed it?

 

I believe Chames.

I believe Chames.

 

Thanks. Just helps with the content of the discussion.

Did they award a technical foul? If so, my only question would be if it wasn't intentional or flagrant, why the tech? And who was the player that committed it?

 

The player was called for an intentional foul. Then HC bench was accessed a technical foul. Holmes shot four free throws.

I don't think so.

 

I think I can solve your misunderstanding either way, but is your perception about what occurred because you saw it and you believe you saw a punch delivered, or because someone you trust told you it occurred?

I heard it was a punch to the face.

 

You heard wrong, way wrong.

 

I don't think so.

 

If I had to pick who to believe.....I'm going with Pedro Mitchell.

If I had to pick who to believe.....I'm going with Pedro Mitchell.

 

I wouldn't he is a HC guy. I'm not a fan of either team nor is the person that seen it happen.

It wasn't a punch to the face, it was a hard foul.

I wouldn't he is a HC guy. I'm not a fan of either team nor is the person that seen it happen.

 

I know that, and he was probably there (I'm almost 100% certain of that).

It wasn't a punch to the face, it was a hard foul.

 

Agreed

Is there video? And why did HC bench get a technical? And for those that were there, why was it perceived as intentional by the refs? Was it intentional? And if so why? Did something happen to provoke the intention?

Is there video? And why did HC bench get a technical? And for those that were there, why was it perceived as intentional by the refs? Was it intentional? And if so why? Did something happen to provoke the intention?

 

The foul was initially called a regular foul. The Holmes player was down on the court being looked at by the trainer, while was she being helped the refs huddled. After a couple of minutes or so one ref signaled intentional foul, the HC bench erupted then the same ref signaled a technical foul.

The foul was initially called a regular foul. The Holmes player was down on the court being looked at by the trainer' date=' while was she being helped the refs huddled. After a couple of minutes or so one ref signaled intentional foul, the HC bench erupted then the same ref signaled a technical foul.[/quote']

 

Actually it was called a flagrant foul since Holmes got to shoot the 4 free throws and awarded the possession afterwards.

The foul was initially called a regular foul. The Holmes player was down on the court being looked at by the trainer' date=' while was she being helped the refs huddled. After a couple of minutes or so one ref signaled intentional foul, the HC bench erupted then the same ref signaled a technical foul.[/quote']

That is 100 percent accurate, and the reason there were 4 FT's awarded. The only question I had was as to the intentional vs. flagrant issue. Isn't a player ejected on a flagrant?