February 16, 201610 yr If anyone needs to be prosecuted it's his supervisor. They did a far worse job of performing their duties than he did. If it was a criminal conspiracy then I agree but if it was ineptitude I don't see how there would be any violation of law on the part of the supervisor. However, no question the supervisor, and maybe a couple of supers up the chain, should be fired.
February 16, 201610 yr If it was a criminal conspiracy then I agree but if it was ineptitude I don't see how there would be any violation of law on the part of the supervisor. However, no question the supervisor, and maybe a couple of supers up the chain, should be fired. For the record I don't think any of them should be prosecuted. But I sure as hell would be wanting to fire the person he reported to.
February 16, 201610 yr Or....the company had so little over-sight that someone slipped through the cracks and now because they are so embarrassed they make him out to be a swindler. Was he in the wrong? Obviously. Should they be rewarded with a judgment for their complete lack of institutional control? Not in my opinion. I have mixed feelings on a "judgment" but that is a civil remedy. A prosecution is criminal and often doesn't include any legal authority for restitution. In other words, the company isn't being rewarded, they actually would be put to work to make a case while at the same time helping prosecute an obvious criminal.
February 16, 201610 yr From what I read it doesn't look like he made any effort to deceive anyone. Office was vacant, he didn't lie when asked what he did, it appears he is open about not being there... Did he cash the checks? Did he do the work? That is all you need to know, everything else is noise.
February 16, 201610 yr Did he cash the checks? Did he do the work? That is all you need to know, everything else is noise. He obviously did the work just fine. He did it for six years with not one complaint from his supervisors . Hell, he did it SO well he was up for an award for his service...
February 16, 201610 yr He obviously did the work just fine. He did it for six years. Hell, he did it SO well he was up for an award for his service... Then according to Hammurabi's Code his award would be six years in the Hoosegow.
February 16, 201610 yr Then according to Hammurabi's Code his award would be six years in the Hoosegow. Ummm...ok???
February 16, 201610 yr Ummm...ok??? Just shifting away from the seriousness of theft/fraud so that MTGL's next bucket can be warmed up a little.
February 16, 201610 yr My first thoughts it was a FedEx employee that doubles as a Event Coordinator for NCC!
February 16, 201610 yr My first thoughts it was a FedEx employee that doubles as a Event Coordinator for NCC! And moonlights as a BGP reporter.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.