March 24, 201511 yr (Women's) North Carolina hit a shot with 0.6 left to break an 84-84 tie. It was at that point that UNC players left the bench and ran on to the court to celebrate. Problem is, there was still time on the clock and a technical should have been called. Refs did not call one and used the explanation of "the celebration did not interfere with play." Buying that excuse or should a technical have been issued? Paging @Clyde for what he thinks.
March 24, 201511 yr Yes should have been a T-Foul. The Buckeyes with 7-8 players all season long. They will be a dominating force next season, when they are at full strength.
March 24, 201511 yr (Women's) North Carolina hit a shot with 0.6 left to break an 84-84 tie. It was at that point that UNC players left the bench and ran on to the court to celebrate. Problem is, there was still time on the clock and a technical should have been called. Refs did not call one and used the explanation of "the celebration did not interfere with play." Buying that excuse or should a technical have been issued? Paging @Clyde for what he thinks. Same thing happened out west in a conference tourney championship. Refs actually stopped the game and then said no T. By rule, it's a T. Did OSU try to inbound the ball and was stopped because of players on the floor?
March 25, 201511 yr Author Same thing happened out west in a conference tourney championship. Refs actually stopped the game and then said no T. By rule, it's a T. Did OSU try to inbound the ball and was stopped because of players on the floor? They inbounded the ball to the center of the court. They didn't show the full replay on SportsCenter as the camera was focused on the celebration but it looked like the inbound happened away from the celebration.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.