They lost to them 3 times, and won 1 time. They're 1 win came after McCracken had played 8 games in 36 hours in that heat. Congratulations to Scott but I still believe McCracken was better.
I don't know why you seem to think I have a connection to McCracken. And the objective of the tournament is to see who the best team is, not who has an easier first round draw and who can overcome 8 games in 95 degree weather in 36 hours. I don't think the best team won it all. Just like I don't think Scott Co. would've been able to make that same run that McCracken did.
No, I like the double elimination for the most part and think the boys should do it that way as well. But anyone who doesn't see 8 games in 36 hours as a huge disadvantage is a fool.
Guess what, I'm entitled to my opinion, whether you like it or not. Yes I think McCracken is better than Scott Co. They beat them 3 of 4 times and had those 8 games been scattered over 3 days, I think McCracken would have beat them a 4th time. I think most would agree.
No offense to the winners but McCracken owned them this year. Had the 2nd game been played on Sunday, I think McCracken makes it 4 for 4 against Scott Co. this year. The longest break McCracken had between games today was 20 minutes I believe. That's just rediculous.