Final

Leslie is now 0-5 on the season. They have been outscored 224-8. The only 2 games they have even a slight chance at winning are against Knott County & maybe North Laurel but I don't think they will win either.

 

Good luck Leslie.

Leslie is now 0-5 on the season. They have been outscored 224-8. The only 2 games they have even a slight chance at winning are against Knott County & maybe North Laurel but I don't think they will win either.

 

Good luck Leslie.

 

They will have no shot against NL.

They will have no shot against NL.

 

Oh, you mean the same NL who will likely have 1 win going into that match up? Gotcha...:thumb:

 

I didn't say they would win. I said if their going to get a win, NL and Knott would be the easiest to get it against. :thumb:

They will have no shot against NL.

 

 

Based on What????

 

 

Leslie is weak, but North only has one player....Wardrup, but he is a heck of an athlete.

 

If you are on the field you have a chance to win. AND North may (like years past) may have thrown in the towel by then.

Oh, you mean the same NL who will likely have 1 win going into that match up? Gotcha...:thumb:

 

I didn't say they would win. I said if their going to get a win, NL and Knott would be the easiest to get it against. :thumb:

Yeah, that's the same NL team I'm talking about.

 

Let me ask you though, is this the same Leslie team that has scored 8 points ON THE SEASON?:thumb:

Based on What????

 

 

Leslie is weak, but North only has one player....Wardrup, but he is a heck of an athlete.

 

If you are on the field you have a chance to win. AND North may (like years past) may have thrown in the towel by then.

 

Based on me knowing what a touchdown is and Leslie doesn't.

 

You're talking about a team that has scored one touchdown all year, and hasn't been competitive in one game they have played in, not one. NL has been competitive in a few if not all of their games.

 

So that's what my post is based on.:thumb:

ttt

Based on me knowing what a touchdown is and Leslie doesn't.

 

You're talking about a team that has scored one touchdown all year, and hasn't been competitive in one game they have played in, not one. NL has been competitive in a few if not all of their games.

 

So that's what my post is based on.:thumb:

 

:lol: :laugh:

 

Wow. You do know that NL has been beaten by an AVERAGE of 20 PPG right??? They have only been competetive in 1 of those games. Nice try though...:thumb:

:lol: :laugh:

 

Wow. You do know that NL has been beaten by an AVERAGE of 20 PPG right??? They have only been competetive in 1 of those games. Nice try though...:thumb:

Well lets see where you're worng here.....

 

NL has actually WON a game, so that means they would have been competitive in that one, which was against Lawrence Co., who apparently is the best 0-6 team of all time. They lost 51-29 to South Laurel, even if it doesn't look like it, they were also competitive in that game. LCC only beat them by 3, I guess you could say that's a competitive game, right? And Pulaski beat them by 17, pretty sure that's competitve as well. So that looks like atleast 4 games they we're competitive in.:thumb:

We'll reel this one back on the topic of LCC vs Leslie or some of you will be on the outside looking in. Take the personal junk to the PM's. This will be the only warning!

Well lets see where you're worng here.....

 

NL has actually WON a game, so that means they would have been competitive in that one, which was against Lawrence Co., who apparently is the best 0-6 team of all time. They lost 51-29 to South Laurel, even if it doesn't look like it, they were also competitive in that game. LCC only beat them by 3, I guess you could say that's a competitive game, right? And Pulaski beat them by 17, pretty sure that's competitve as well. So that looks like atleast 4 games they we're competitive in.:thumb:

 

edit.

 

PM'd response.