Well thats different.... I was simply posting in regard to your comments that you seemed to think because they didn't strike enough people out that they didn't get very good pitching.

 

No, been around the game long enough to know what a pitcher is supposed to do. If you remember last year, Ryle did not have a set em up / sit em down dominating pitcher yet they won 37 games with a tremoundus defense and good hitters. Our pitching only averaged 4 K's a game, but on average we put 9 runs on the board per game.

 

I feel CCH is in a similar situation if they play D.

 

But dominating pitching......Not.

No, been around the game long enough to know what a pitcher is supposed to do. If you remember last year, Ryle did not have a set em up / sit em down dominating pitcher yet they won 37 games with a tremoundus defense and good hitters. Our pitching only averaged 4 K's a game, but on average we put 9 runs on the board per game.

 

I feel CCH is in a similar situation if they play D.

 

But dominating pitching......Not.

 

Well I don't remember anything being said about dominant, but it seems like you agree that they were great pitching performances then. Just not "dominant" by your standards.

Well I don't remember anything being said about dominant, but it seems like you agree that they were great pitching performances then. Just not "dominant" by your standards.

 

 

Exactly...they got the job done, didn't walk many and gave us a chance to win every game we were in. But, if you recall Cov Cath fielding has been taking a beating on the field and on BGP and obviously they played better this weekend. I guess I look at stats and read a lot into them but that's what they are there for.