November 6, 200718 yr But Harrison was. and to act like it had no affect on the game is insane. Colts blew the game without him, and should have won, but Harrison being out affecting the game is a fact, not an excuse. Let's play the if game...what if the officiating had been better and Indy hadn't been given the ball inside the ten twice on questionable interference calls... Bottom Line: The Colts cannot beat the 2007 New England Patriots. Period. Sunday was their best chance. You can talk all you want about Harrison being out, but here's the thing...Indy had a 10 point lead with 9 minutes to play. If they were good enough to beat New England, then they could have protected a 10 point lead with 9 minutest to play on their home field, Harrison or not. The Patriots are better, and if they play again in Foxboro, the game won't be nearly as close.
November 6, 200718 yr 725 and 4 TDs in 14 games last year. Off the charts. And RP brought him up... He's definitely better than anyone Peyton has ever had to throw to...I mean come on...how did Manning ever rack up those stats with Marvin Harrison... Brady has always done the job with less supporting cast on offense than Manning...now that he has an equal or superior group, he's going to break Peyton's record. Tom Brady is the best QB in the NFL...and he's the NFL MVP. Brady has always delivered very good numbers, and more importantly in the win column, regardless of his receiving corps...now that he's got some studs, he's going to have the greatest season by a QB in NFL history. Moss, on the other hand, doesn't always deliver. My point...Brady may not be on record setting pace without Moss, but he'd still probably throw for 3,500+ yards and 30 TD's...what would Moss be doing without Brady? Who knows?
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.