5wide Posted August 29, 2007 Share Posted August 29, 2007 ^I sent you a PM...we'll explore the possibility...is that correct GM lingo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98NCCalum Posted August 29, 2007 Share Posted August 29, 2007 If it's between Harrington or Huard I'll take Harrington. Since technically that pick was not legal he's available correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godot Posted August 29, 2007 Author Share Posted August 29, 2007 Let's be fair: The rules clearly state that you can't have more than two starting QBs on your roster.Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HammerTime Posted August 29, 2007 Share Posted August 29, 2007 Do we have to wait till the draft is over to announce a trade? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godot Posted August 29, 2007 Author Share Posted August 29, 2007 Do you think we need to move up the clock?It wouldn't hurt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godot Posted August 29, 2007 Author Share Posted August 29, 2007 Do we have to wait till the draft is over to announce a trade?Not really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98NCCalum Posted August 29, 2007 Share Posted August 29, 2007 If it's between Harrington or Huard I'll take Harrington. Since technically that pick was not legal he's available correct?Godot, is this correct? Since everyone ahead of me has two QB's I can go ahead and announce my pick to speed things up correct? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5wide Posted August 29, 2007 Share Posted August 29, 2007 Move it up and let's get this thing over with...the damage from missing a pick now would be minimal to say the least...:lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SvFan4life Posted August 29, 2007 Share Posted August 29, 2007 If it's between Harrington or Huard I'll take Harrington. Since technically that pick was not legal he's available correct? Technically he wasn't picked, but then you'd have to ask anyone that has picked since then that doesn't already have 2 QB's, at least I would think so! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SvFan4life Posted August 29, 2007 Share Posted August 29, 2007 Move it up and let's get this thing over with...the damage from missing a pick now would be minimal to say the least...:lol: :thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5wide Posted August 29, 2007 Share Posted August 29, 2007 Technically he wasn't picked, but then you'd have to ask anyone that has picked since then that doesn't already have 2 QB's, at least I would think so! I'm the only other person without two QB's and he picks before me, so he's good to go as far as that goes... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98NCCalum Posted August 29, 2007 Share Posted August 29, 2007 I'm the only other person without two QB's and he picks before me, so he's good to go as far as that goes...I checked that first. :thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SvFan4life Posted August 29, 2007 Share Posted August 29, 2007 I'm the only other person without two QB's and he picks before me, so he's good to go as far as that goes... :thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godot Posted August 30, 2007 Author Share Posted August 30, 2007 Godot, is this correct? Since everyone ahead of me has two QB's I can go ahead and announce my pick to speed things up correct?I don't see any harm in that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Godot Posted August 30, 2007 Author Share Posted August 30, 2007 If it's between Harrington or Huard I'll take Harrington. Since technically that pick was not legal he's available correct?Technically I don't think Harrington had been made the starter when he was drafted (way back) in the 13th round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts