Rose Hill vs Fairview

Boyd vs Ashland

Also they voted to seed the district next year.

Rose Hill vs Fairview

Boyd vs Ashland

Also they voted to seed the district next year.

Who is host this year?

Boyd?

Who is host this year?

Boyd County

Voting to seed is huge in the 64th district. With the loss of seeding when district restructuring occurred (with the loss of Lawence and addition of Fairview) I didn't think that seeding in the 64th would ever be voted back. Who cast the deciding vote-Fairview or RH (and what is their motive?)

Voting to seed is huge in the 64th district. With the loss of seeding when district restructuring occurred (with the loss of Lawence and addition of Fairview) I didn't think that seeding in the 64th would ever be voted back. Who cast the deciding vote-Fairview or RH (and what is their motive?)

I was told the Hill seconded the motion by Ashland.

Thanks Jay - If the girls seed do the boys automatically have to seed next year also, or do the boys and girls vote separately on this issue?

Both boys and girls voted seeding in for next year.

Both boys and girls voted seeding in for next year.

 

How about after next year?

How about after next year?

I believe the seeding issue is voted on every year.

I was told the Hill seconded the motion by Ashland.

It takes a majority vote to get it changed 50/50 keeps it the same. Dont look for it to ever change. Boyd or Fairview must have voted for it also.

It takes a majority vote to get it changed 50/50 keeps it the same. Dont look for it to ever change. Boyd or Fairview must have voted for it also.

All they needed was three votes so Fairview was not needed. BTW dont know how Fairview voted.

It really surprises me that RH would vote to seed, especially for the year after Terry and queen graduate. I know that RH has a nice crop of very young players that may be very good in several years, but the next few years may be tough for the Lady Royals. Why wouldn't RH wait until they get older before this decision? I'm sure that Boyd and Ashland will probably always want to seed, so its not like RH had to jump on the opportunity this year. Can anyone close to the RH girl's program give me RH's reasoning for seeding in the 64th?

It really surprises me that RH would vote to seed, especially for the year after Terry and queen graduate. I know that RH has a nice crop of very young players that may be very good in several years, but the next few years may be tough for the Lady Royals. Why wouldn't RH wait until they get older before this decision? I'm sure that Boyd and Ashland will probably always want to seed, so its not like RH had to jump on the opportunity this year. Can anyone close to the RH girl's program give me RH's reasoning for seeding in the 64th?

 

For the best interests of Rose Hill, there is no legitimate reason for the boys or the girls to seed.

I believe the seeding issue is voted on every year.

 

 

The important question is not whether or not they vote each year. It is in regard to which method wins in case of a tie vote. Are the little schools stuck with eternal seeding because one of them showed a lack of wisdom?