HHSDad Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 Technically speaking, DD is correct. He said that the Clinton's were "not found guilty". He did not say that the Clinton's were found "not guilty". Frances Were you on Nixon's defense team Frances? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fastbreak Posted October 3, 2006 Share Posted October 3, 2006 Were you on Nixon's defense team Frances? Only "technically." :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamond Dandy Posted October 3, 2006 Author Share Posted October 3, 2006 Meanwhile, back to the thread. Secratary Rice must have recieved her herbal shipment that I recommended. She suddenly recalls a meeting with Tenet and Black. Hummmmm......Paper trail? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frances Bavier Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 Were you on Nixon's defense team Frances? LOL - with my knowledge of the legal system, I'd say Nixon would have politely declined my advice - and it would have been a very astute move to do so... Frances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diamond Dandy Posted October 6, 2006 Author Share Posted October 6, 2006 Question ???? How come "STATE OF DENIAL" is not listed on the RNC web site as a MUST READ like Woodward's two previous books were? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladiesbballcoach Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 Question ???? How come "STATE OF DENIAL" is not listed on the RNC web site as a MUST READ like Woodward's two previous books were? The easy humorous answer is they don't list fiction on the website.:lol: The reality it does not lend itself to further their political agenda and cause in November. Benefit to the country is irrelevant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts