Please help me understand the significance of the question.

 

SK has one kid that plays both ways and it is only certain situations. Conner probably has 7 or 8.

SK has one kid that plays both ways and it is only certain situations. Conner probably has 7 or 8.

 

Who are the "7 or 8?"

SK has one kid that plays both ways and it is only certain situations. Conner probably has 7 or 8.

 

Again I ask. What is the significance?

Who are the "7 or 8?"

 

 

I was asking who?

I was asking who?

 

You said "Conner probably has 7 or 8."

 

I'm asking who they are.

Last time SK and Conner played all I heard was how much better Conner was. What happened?

You said "Conner probably has 7 or 8."

 

I'm asking who they are.

 

And I said probably.

edit

And I said probably.

 

So what you're saying is you don't know anything and are just filling space in this thread.

So what you're saying is you don't know anything and are just filling space in this thread.

 

Yeah that's it. Guess to hard of a question for you to answer?

Yeah that's it. Guess to hard of a question for you to answer?

 

I now have the urge to drive up to Sears, head for the Craftsman aisle, and get me some new tools!

Simple questions for simple minds.

I don't want anybody to get lost on the Conner bandwagon.

So what you're saying is you don't know anything and are just filling space in this thread.

 

Sorry for asking such a hard question.

Sorry for asking such a hard question.

 

Your original post (regarding the 7 or 8 players) was never in the form of a question. It was a statement. In all my years of empirical research I have never come across someone as confusing as you. When you graduate up to the "simple" level then I am sure we will understand.