That's not exactly the story.....the NCAA met with Calipari and Rose....they said they had concern that he might not have taken the test.....and that if they played him, they were at risk if he was found ineligible....Cal asked Rose...he said he took the test.....Cal played him. Now, the NCAA never had to prove that he didn't take it. Rose said he would cooperate with the investigation....but once he left Memphis....he refused to speak to the NCAA again......case closed.

 

So because he didn't speak to the NCAA he's guilty?

So because he didn't speak to the NCAA he's guilty?

 

 

If I was innocent I'd clear my name and the school's name as well. He's either innocent and could care less about Memphis or he's guilty. Not a good look on Rose's part any way you slice it.