No, No you misunderstand. What I am saying it that people distort the word of God, as you call it, for profit all the time. Just look at a lot of the Health and Wealth Christian Self Help books.
My believing has no affect on my observation...
I actually said that I would be for making anything after first trimester illegal. I said that because I felt that at some point a compromise would have to be made, and that compromise would be acceptable to me.
They aren't different, thats the basis of my argument. The mother has a right to do to the same to the cells in her womb, as she would cells anywhere else in her body. Once those cells leave her body, then she no longer has a right to terminate their function.
I just do not believe that a group of cells inside a womb have the same value as a fully birthed human. I cant really explain why I believe this way, it just makes the most sense to me. As I am sure your opinion makes the most sense to you and your value system.
I am proud of that, in reference to your last add on.
I am for anything that will cause less damage to the environment than we are currently doing. IMO, it doesn't matter how cheaply we can run are cars if we cant breathe.
Its not a contradiction. I have stated that I don't consider a fetus or embryo to be of the same worth or even to be put into the same class as a human who is outside the womb. Just because you don't like my opinion, does not mean I am arguing in circles. :thumb::bunny:
Am I and by extent my New Testament professor not correct in the fact; that the twelve disciples felt that you first had to become a Jew and follow to law to become a Christian.
Was it not Paul who propagated the belief that you did not have to follow the law to become a Christian.
Again I dont have a anything goes, anything is permissible viewpoint. Just because I believe in strong personal freedom,does not make me a anything goes guy.