So if the veto was in place in your league and a player who'd made the claim they were vetoing every single trade that came across, and kept good on that claim, tried to make a trade, you wouldn't veto it?

 

Like I said, I play to win, you guys obviously don't. If him adding DeSean Jackson lowers my chances at winning, I'm doing everything in my power to see that it doesn't happen.

 

And, what I said was that that's the answer I'd stick with, instead of trying to use baseball's waiver system, that only goes into effect after the July 31st trade deadline, as some sort of justification.

If the trade is on the up and up I don't see the reason to veto. If two people agree to what they feel is a fair trade, then the trade should be put through.