mcraycraft Posted January 22, 2009 Author Posted January 22, 2009 Stats Male Hayes 12 pts, 7 reb Jones 4 pts Reynolds 5 pts Mason 2 pts Glenn 13 pts, 4 rebs Branch 3 pts, 4 rebs Logan 5 pts Bell 3 pts, 2rebs Moore 4 pts Brasher 6 pts, 4 rebs Horne 13 pts, 10 rebs FG% 48.3 3pt% 18.2 FT% 71.4 Rebounds 40 Montgomerey County Robinson 11 pts, 10 rebs Danis 2 rebs Curtis 15 pts 3 rebs Mullins 2 pts Rash 3 rebs Hendrix 2 pts Darnell 3 rebs Fruth 1 reb Crisp 3 pts, 9 rebs Manship 3 rebs Craycraft 2 pts Combs 7 pts, 3 rebs FG% 22.4 3pt% 16.1 FT% 53.8 Rebounds 48
mcraycraft Posted January 22, 2009 Author Posted January 22, 2009 Rash injured his ankle in the second quarter and did not return. I do not know how bad it is. He was limping after the game.
doomer Posted January 22, 2009 Posted January 22, 2009 Rash injured his ankle in the second quarter and did not return. I do not know how bad it is. He was limping after the game. Sorry to hear that. I wondered why his points were so low. He is a good player.
IC Posted January 22, 2009 Posted January 22, 2009 Hopefully he'll be fully recovered by tourney time. The Indians success depends on him.
FANOFTHE11th Posted January 22, 2009 Posted January 22, 2009 Rash injured his ankle in the second quarter and did not return. I do not know how bad it is. He was limping after the game. Most likely the reason for the score differential. Rash is a very good player and without question their go to guy.
mcraycraft Posted January 22, 2009 Author Posted January 22, 2009 What is Montgomery's record now? 8-11
friedtaters Posted January 22, 2009 Posted January 22, 2009 8-11 I thought the paper was wrong the other day when they had them at 8-9 after the Franklin loss. They were actually 8-10 after that game right?
mcraycraft Posted January 22, 2009 Author Posted January 22, 2009 I thought the paper was wrong the other day when they had them at 8-9 after the Franklin loss. They were actually 8-10 after that game right? Clark loss made it 8-9, Franklin 8-10, and Male 8-11
friedtaters Posted January 22, 2009 Posted January 22, 2009 Clark loss made it 8-9, Franklin 8-10, and Male 8-11 That's what I thought. Thanks for the clarification. Hope Montgomery people remember complaining about Rison's soft schedules when judging this record. Greisser has played an awfully tough schedule this season and paid for it.
mcraycraft Posted January 22, 2009 Author Posted January 22, 2009 There is not a team that Montgomery County has played that they should not have been there. If they could only have hit 40-42% of their field goals, 30% of their 3 point attempts, AND 70-75% of their FREE throws, they would have been in the games. For the most part, they are taking open shots. Just cannot get them to fall.
friedtaters Posted January 22, 2009 Posted January 22, 2009 There is not a team that Montgomery County has played that they should not have been there. If they could only have hit 40-42% of their field goals, 30% of their 3 point attempts, AND 70-75% of their FREE throws, they would have been in the games. For the most part, they are taking open shots. Just cannot get them to fall. What's puzzling is they have some good shooters on this team. One thing I have noticed is they don't handle big, physical teams well on the inside.
Butterfly Baby Posted January 22, 2009 Posted January 22, 2009 Clark loss made it 8-9, Franklin 8-10, and Male 8-11 Montgomerys schedule has been brutal.
bcd00 Posted January 22, 2009 Posted January 22, 2009 (edited) Hopefully Brandon Rash's injury is not to serious, Indians go where he goes. Edited January 22, 2009 by Ram Rule 13
Recommended Posts