Here is what I was thinking:

 

37th-Bishop Brossart, Scott, Silver Grove, Calvary Christian

38th-Pendleton, Harrison, Nicholas, Campbell

39th-Augusta, Bracken, Deming, St. Pat

40th-Montgomery, Mason, GRC, Paris, Bourbon County

 

Don't agree with this due to putting the "normally" powerhouses in one district. This is speaking on the term of basketball. I think the districts should be done on the least travel for a team.

What about moving Clark Co. to the 11th? I think this makes good sense when you compare them by enrollment and geographically with the other teams in the 11th. This would open up a slot in the 10th for Fleming Co. to move back in, and strenthen the 39th district. The 39th hasn't been the same since Fleming was moved to the 16th.

What about moving Clark Co. to the 11th? I think this makes good sense when you compare them by enrollment and geographically with the other teams in the 11th. This would open up a slot in the 10th for Fleming Co. to move back in, and strenthen the 39th district.

The 39th hasn't been the same since Fleming was moved to the 16th.

 

Nothing has changed since Fleming moved out of the 39th district. Mason Co. has still been winning that district.

Nothing has changed since Fleming moved out of the 39th district. Mason Co. has still been winning that district.

 

I can't argue with that, but you can't tell me the atmosphere, during the district tournament, in the Fieldhouse has been anywhere close to what it was before the Panthers were moved. At least with Fleming Co. in the 39th, there's a chance that Mason Co. gets a challange at the district level.

I can't argue with that, but you can't tell me the atmosphere, during the district tournament, in the Fieldhouse has been anywhere close to what it was before the Panthers were moved. At least with Fleming Co. in the 39th, there's a chance that Mason Co. gets a challange at the district level.

 

I cant argue with your statement either.