Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Obama and Gay Rights

Featured Replies

Examples?

 

Ok, 1. Right to marriage. It's not anywhere in the constitution. It's a privacy right guaranteed through our liberty rights. It's, as we learned in Con Law,a penumbra of rights generated through a collection of Amendments.

 

2. Right to fulfill an occupation. These laws are to ensure that you get or get rejected from employment on qualifications, not b/c of race, sex, disability, or sexual orientation.

 

That's all that the hate crime thing is doing, its to ensure that homosexuals don't get discriminated on the basis of their sexual orientation. It's not asking for a quota to be filled or a special hiring task force be assigned.

  • Replies 47
  • Views 4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
If we're talking marriage, it's a special right since a marriage is defined as being between a man and a women. A civil union I have no problem with.

 

Here's the problem w/ civil unions, if you want to grant them in KY. CT and CA, before Prop 8 found that civil unions bestow create a lesser classification on homosexuals and is a violation of equal protection. I know that Vermont and a few other states allow them, and New York recognizes them if a couple moves in from out of state, but that's grounds for a Constitutional question and the court would have to take that case. It's almost all or nothing. Remember, CT released this opinion on 10/28 and California released theirs in May, so, while new, may be the way that courts start looking at civil unions.

 

Again, marriage wasn't officially defined as b/n a man and woman until the DOMA in 2006. It however, has always been seen as such in common law from what I've read. Again, I'm not a Constitutional Law lawyer, or a lawyer in anything.

So you can't reference something if you don't believe it? Can I not make a reference to Mein Kampf when teaching because I don't believe in it?

 

Just applies to the Bible if you ask me.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.