westsider Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 I understand that Hazard was missing quite a few of it's players, but I'm not sure the 9th, 10th, and 11th man make that much of a difference... But if we're counting them then SV was also missing it's 8th, 9th, and 10th players in Cody Varney, Logan Lucas, and Dylan Tackett...And how does that compare to Hazard missing two returning starters and a potential third starter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eta Rho Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 I think this would have been a better game with Campbell in there. Very impressive showing by the Bulldogs for only have two or three true starters in the lineup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
King James Posted November 21, 2008 Author Share Posted November 21, 2008 And how does that compare to Hazard missing two returning starters and a potential third starter? I agree that Hazard was weakened by missing 2 starters... I think if they had been there Hazard would have been able to give SV a much more competitive game. :thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KIDS FAN Posted November 21, 2008 Share Posted November 21, 2008 Hazard is 6 to 8 points better with both teams fully staffed. SV is a great team but Hazard has to many weapons and much more depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts