I understand that Hazard was missing quite a few of it's players, but I'm not sure the 9th, 10th, and 11th man make that much of a difference... But if we're counting them then SV was also missing it's 8th, 9th, and 10th players in Cody Varney, Logan Lucas, and Dylan Tackett...

And how does that compare to Hazard missing two returning starters and a potential third starter?

I think this would have been a better game with Campbell in there. Very impressive showing by the Bulldogs for only have two or three true starters in the lineup.

And how does that compare to Hazard missing two returning starters and a potential third starter?

 

I agree that Hazard was weakened by missing 2 starters... I think if they had been there Hazard would have been able to give SV a much more competitive game. :thumb:

Hazard is 6 to 8 points better with both teams fully staffed. SV is a great team but Hazard has to many weapons and much more depth.