In that case the disclaimer came out immediately. In this case no one has come out to dispute the claim. You would think it would have come out immediately, if not sooner.

 

I agree. Just wondered. I thought I recall it taking a day or so for the Iraqi prez to speak to it in the prior case.

Your the first one to seemingly couch his/her comments with that disclaimer (at least as boldly as you stated it.). So does anyone know if this is truly what happened? Is it part of what happened? Is any of it what happened?

 

I find it amusing because I thought a not long ago there was a bold story about the Iraqi Prez wanting troops out sooner. Then when the story was checked out it was not exactly like that at all. Some here stated, "Typical liberal media jumping out there without checking facts."

 

Now a similar event has occurred but the roles and posters seem to have switched viewpoints on the whole matter. :confused:

If you want to reread my posts, you will find not one, but two instances where Obama reportedly interfered with the negotiations - once by phone and once in person. Unless NBC's Athena Jones, the New York Post's Amir Taheri, and Obama's own national security spokeswoman Wendy Morigi all fabricated their stories, Obama did, in fact, attempt to interfere with the Bush administration's negotiations with the Iraqi government.

Obama's priorities: NOT what's good for the country, but rather what's good for him.

 

:thumb: You nailed it Bluto. Obama has only one agenda and he sees it every time he looks in the mirror.