FBALL Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 You absolutely can't put Bradley in the same group as Crawford and Morris. Lazy players vs. a player with alot of heart. Bradley is frustrating to watch sometimes but he doesn't begin to touch the level of laziness of Crawford/Morris. Again I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickyp Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 FBall, I agree with most of everything that you said. My point is that Fitch and Daniels were not choir boys they also had issues. Chuck Hayes on the other hand was on a different level when it came to character. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4chs Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 You absolutely can't put Bradley in the same group as Crawford and Morris. Lazy players vs. a player with alot of heart. Bradley is frustrating to watch sometimes but he doesn't begin to touch the level of laziness of Crawford/Morris. Bradley sometimes tries too hard...........and therefore tries to do too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FBALL Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 FBall, I agree with most of everything that you said. My point is that Fitch and Daniels were not choir boys they also had issues. Chuck Hayes on the other hand was on a different level when it came to character. And I will agree with that. But it doesn't take a choir boy to play basketball. And play as a member of a team. Choir boys? No. Players with heart? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickyp Posted February 27, 2007 Share Posted February 27, 2007 And I will agree with that. But it doesn't take a choir boy to play basketball. And play as a member of a team. Choir boys? No. Players with heart? Yes. Agreed again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts