If the Bengals and Reds swapped owners, which team would it benefit the most:

Bengals with Bob Castellin as the Owner or the Reds with Mike Brown as the Owner?

 

Why?

Edited March 10, 20188 yr by Jumper_Dad

I picked the Bengals with Castellini. I’m think some fresh faces and perspectives need to be present in the offices at PBS. The Bengals have the talent to be successful in this league on both sides of the ball, they just need better leadership from coaches and front office.

I feel like baseball and football are different worlds and it’s really hard to compare the two.

 

I think Mike Brown is the villain in Cincinnati and the Reds are up against it as a small market. You’d be hard pressed to judge Castelini in the same light as Brown.

I feel like baseball and football are different worlds and it’s really hard to compare the two.

 

I think Mike Brown is the villain in Cincinnati and the Reds are up against it as a small market. You’d be hard pressed to judge Castelini in the same light as Brown.

 

It shouldn't be hard...which owner do you have more confidence in doing a good job.

 

A good owner is a good owner, regardless of sport IMO.

 

Would the Bengals be better off with an owner that was more hands off?

 

Would the Reds be better off with a more hands on owner like Brown?

It shouldn't be hard...which owner do you have more confidence in doing a good job.

 

A good owner is a good owner, regardless of sport IMO.

 

Would the Bengals be better off with an owner that was more hands off?

 

Would the Reds be better off with a more hands on owner like Brown?

Give me the Bengals being better off with Castelini.

I voted both would be worse.