Yes, if it's what you do. We did when I was in high school. We either pooched or onside kicked. Didn't matter who we played. You don't just decide, hey lets kick it deep when you don't cover deep. You don't have to like it, but I am fine with it no matter who you play...if that's what you do, that's what you do. You don't change who you are for who you play, no matter how bad. I dont know the circumstances but if they played all the back ups and they still scored, then that's on Jtown. If they are that bad should they just forfeit? This isn't the first time they gave up 70 this season. They may just be that bad boys.

 

How is that different than a team who plays wide open passing offense changing what they do when up big and switching to a running offense to run out the clock and not run up the score?

How is that different than a team who plays wide open passing offense changing what they do when up big and switching to a running offense to run out the clock and not run up the score?

 

Did they onside it the 2nd half or was this something they worked on in the first half if it's not their mainstay? I don't know of any offense that throws it every single down and then puts their backups in and decides to make up run plays. Did Ballard play their back ups and back ups back ups? If the back ups were in and scored I have ZERO problem with that. Those kids have earned the right to play as hard as they can. Trinity I think was the other team that scored 70 and I assume they put their back ups in. Could it be possible that Jtown is the worst team in 6A and the end was inevitable? I feel bad for the Jtown kids, but if Ballard's back up kids scored 4 TD's or something like that, then that's not on Ballard. Now if they left their starters in ALL game, then shame on them and I retract my point of view in this discussion.