July 5, 201610 yr The terror related events by refugees across the globe prove that. This just shows they are patient. Why is it a crazy idea to freeze refugees from terror supported countries with what's going on across the globe. After the CIA director basically predicted a similar event in America after the Turkey event. While I don't think that what you are saying is a "crazy idea," I feel that those refugees are probably the ones that need help the most. I'm not promoting that we simply accept them into our country tomorrow, but essentially banning them from our country doesn't feel right to me, either.
July 5, 201610 yr Those suspects have been here since 2009: 7 years. In all reality vetted through the previous adminstration if the timeline is similar to what is used today for refugees. Isn't the argument with refugees is there are terrorists embedded? This situation doesn't support that stance. Actually is shows just the opposite of what you claim. The opening the flood gates of refuges is going to be allowing in that many more terrorists who will be attempting to damage the US for many years to come. They have shown they are very patient. Obama's legacy will be terrorizing my grandkids. I'm sure Hillary will continue this inane policy.
July 5, 201610 yr Actually is shows just the opposite of what you claim. The opening the flood gates of refuges is going to be allowing in that many more terrorists who will be attempting to damage the US for many years to come. They have shown they are very patient. Obama's legacy will be terrorizing my grandkids. I'm sure Hillary will continue this inane policy. In all likelihood the accused from article were vetted under the Bush admin. Maybe not. That's speculation on my part considering the length of time used today to vet refugees. How do you know they were patient? Maybe they were radicalized while here. Isis and other terror groups want us to turn our back on these people it furthers their agenda against the west.
July 6, 201610 yr In all likelihood the accused from article were vetted under the Bush admin. Maybe not. That's speculation on my part considering the length of time used today to vet refugees. How do you know they were patient? Maybe they were radicalized while here. Isis and other terror groups want us to turn our back on these people it furthers their agenda against the west. Doesn't matter who vetted them, it shows that even with a much lighter load to vet people can get through. What does that say for the open the gates policy of our fearless leader?
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.