May 15, 201610 yr My main question would be this - did the refugees that are in Australia in the article you cited undergo the same vetting process as those in Bowling Green? I would think that there are several potential differences between the Australian refugees and the Bowling Green refugees. If your trusting the government to do something competently, you should reconsider. I believe it has more to do with their faith than anything. Islam if followed to the letter is not compatible with American values. Sharia law is a very bad thing, for women, theirs and ours and christians. How do you like your head, in a bucket or on a platter? You want to haggle over bathrooms, hell they are allowed and do kill LBGT's. There society is 100,% intolerant of all gay people.
May 15, 201610 yr Someone needs to help Trump out with this information. Today he guaranteed an attack on the US by refugees. Of course, all it takes is one and he can say he is right. In fact, he might already be claiming he is right because of the attack in San Francisco or even the Boston marathon. Are you saying that one attack wouldn't count? How many would it take before he could say he was right...5 attacks...10 attacks? 1 person dead...10 people dead?...20 people dead?
May 15, 201610 yr My main question would be this - did the refugees that are in Australia in the article you cited undergo the same vetting process as those in Bowling Green? I would think that there are several potential differences between the Australian refugees and the Bowling Green refugees. True, Australia is probably more stringent...Joking I don't think we have anyway to know exactly what the vetting process is for either country, so what I assume is your assumption that the US is more stringent could be incorrect.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.