January 26, 201610 yr What does it tell you when they need the Rock to fill half an hour of time in the show.
January 26, 201610 yr It tells you about half their roster is missing. Besides the injuries, Lesnar is not even part time and they lost Punk a while back. Roster is thin at best. Missing major personalities. Don't get to watch as often but when I do I always wish they'd go back to two hours.
January 26, 201610 yr Author I always wish they'd go back to two hours. That'll never happen, but I agree. Even when the roster is more full than it currently is, WWE's primary problem is that it suffers from over exposure. If they only did 6 PPV's a year instead of a dozen, I could see a 3-hour show and maybe Smackdown too. As it stands, two weekly shows filling a total of 5 hours, plus a monthly PPV equals too much. Less is more, but again it'll never happen.
January 27, 201610 yr Agreed. I'm not sure what ratings have been like over last 9-12 months but have to be down. I've also wondered what ratings are throughout the 3 hours. I generally watch first and last half hour and peek in between.
January 27, 201610 yr It was a complete bust, IMO. WWE needs to either kill the 3 hours and go back to 2 hours or add more matches. I do believe that they need to calm it down a bit on all the heated converstations and running your mouth segments in the ring and backstage...
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.