I don't know if it would of changed the outcome. I do know that Grant was down by 1 after one of the penalties. So at the least they would of gotten another chance to tie or take the lead. Things like that also affect the mindset and play calls of both teams.

 

I have no idea but it would be interesting to know if the player was told to go for the kicker the second time. After they saw the penalty would be enforced on the kickoff have a player take a shot at the kicker. It would increase the odds of missing and the kicker is a RB for Grant. Now let me be clear in saying I have no idea if the kid was told to or not. I'm just wondering.

I thought this might be the year that Grant notched a win in this district. Coach Kev has the program going in the right direction.

Sounds like the blown rules call May have affected the outcome.

 

I think the only way it could have affected the outcome was if it occured on 4th down and not an Xtra Pt. Looks like the final score was by more than 2 points.

 

Now as far as the kid being told to go after the kicker, I highly doubt that was the case at all. It wouldn't make any sense. What good is going after the kicker going to do? Block the kick, yes that would be what they would try to do, but not to try and blick the kick and go after the kicker makes zero sense at all and wouldn't have much of an outcome on the game int he first place unless the kid had a great leg and wa a threat for FG's at 30+ yards.