lhs85 Posted January 13, 2006 Posted January 13, 2006 Penick had 14 pts,14 rbs,6 blks and 4 or 5 assist.
Viper Posted January 14, 2006 Posted January 14, 2006 Logan, Rouse, King, Hardin, and Poe also played great games as well. This team is really starting to get in gear.
Theoldguy Posted January 14, 2006 Posted January 14, 2006 Lets see them do it against a big dog. Okay, and I hate to do this, and from growing up in poorer Ludlow it sickens me to type this.........but here goes...... :eek: :eek: Ludlow isn't a big dog and we/they know that! What they are is a very good team for a very small school. This year they are playing rather well in "their level of play". Now is that level of play in the same mode as say CovCath, Holmes, Highlands, the other big dogs? Well no!!!........But let them have their fun also. That is why I think the All "A" is so great. It gives the Ludlows, etc a chance for the right to play "in their level of the big dance". Would I like to see the Sweet Sixteen changed "no way" but.....give the little guy's a break.......
bigstick23 Posted January 14, 2006 Posted January 14, 2006 Okay, and I hate to do this, and from growing up in poorer Ludlow it sickens me to type this.........but here goes...... :eek: :eek: Ludlow isn't a big dog and we/they know that! What they are is a very good team for a very small school. This year they are playing rather well in "their level of play". Now is that level of play in the same mode as say CovCath, Holmes, Highlands, the other big dogs? Well no!!!........But let them have their fun also. That is why I think the All "A" is so great. It gives the Ludlows, etc a chance for the right to play "in their level of the big dance". Would I like to see the Sweet Sixteen changed "no way" but.....give the little guy's a break....... Well with Penick and King they had higher expectitations and they haven't came close to them yet.
futurecoach Posted January 14, 2006 Posted January 14, 2006 Well with Penick and King they had higher expectitations and they haven't came close to them yet. Im a Ludlow fan, but I have to agree with you on that.
BIGZIG Posted January 15, 2006 Posted January 15, 2006 Okay, and I hate to do this, and from growing up in poorer Ludlow it sickens me to type this.........but here goes...... :eek: :eek: Ludlow isn't a big dog and we/they know that! What they are is a very good team for a very small school. This year they are playing rather well in "their level of play". Now is that level of play in the same mode as say CovCath, Holmes, Highlands, the other big dogs? Well no!!!........But let them have their fun also. That is why I think the All "A" is so great. It gives the Ludlows, etc a chance for the right to play "in their level of the big dance". Would I like to see the Sweet Sixteen changed "no way" but.....give the little guy's a break....... :confused: Say what?? You have confused me here Old Guy to say the least.. "Poorer Ludlow"????
Sandman Posted January 15, 2006 Posted January 15, 2006 Well with Penick and King they had higher expectitations and they haven't came close to them yet. I agree 100 percent. If these guys are going to be hyped, then they are going to be held to a higher standard. So far, they've failed to meet those expectations, even against the better D-III schools. Blowout losses to Beechwood and Silver Grove.
Recommended Posts