September 14, 201214 yr Author Thursday Scores West Kentucky Rams (fm) 11 Louisa Lumber (fm) * 2 Southern KY SubVets (fm) 11 Miami Bath Salts ® 0 Huggs Thuggs * 5 Lex-Town Grapplers 0 Florence Fighters 0 Boyle County Belt Collectors 21 Pikeville High Risers 9 Dry Ridge Duckys ® 8 Maytown Mirkers 23 Atwood Fighting' Amish 5 Middle Fork Mustard Seeds 6 Northern Kentucky Blazers * 11 Sawville GymShoes 11 Northern Kentucky Golden Domers ® 0 Shelby Cardinals (fm) 28 Southern KY Bionic Roosters ® 14 Stanton Bums ® 0 Mauk Ridge Maniacs 9 If you don't see your game, there was no one that scored last night
September 14, 201214 yr Author Southern KY SubVets (fm) 11 Miami Bath Salts ® 0 Jay Cutler 11 pts :irked:
September 14, 201214 yr Thursday Scores Florence Fighters 0 Boyle County Belt Collectors 21 I feel blessed to be facing Rodgers this week. I do as well NEERFAN. To come out out of last night (facing Rodgers and Forte) and only be down 21, I count that as a huge blessing. Rogers will score at least 21 by himself probably 80% of the time, if not more. The door has been left open, now the Fighters just need to capitalize!
September 14, 201214 yr Thursday Scores Florence Fighters 0 Boyle County Belt Collectors 21 Not to add salt to the wound, but I have a question about the scoring from last night. Rodgers threw a TD, had 219 yards, but also threw an interception according to ESPN. On the MFL site he scored 14 points, but if they counted the INT, didn't he really have 12? So PP92's score should really be 19? It might not matter, but I will take any help I can get. I only posted it here so that the American Conference owner facing Rodgers was aware as well.
September 14, 201214 yr Not to add salt to the wound, but I have a question about the scoring from last night. Rodgers threw a TD, had 219 yards, but also threw an interception according to ESPN. On the MFL site he scored 14 points, but if they counted the INT, didn't he really have 12? So PP92's score should really be 19? It might not matter, but I will take any help I can get. I only posted it here so that the American Conference owner facing Rodgers was aware as well. I'm not sure INT's are being deducted this year. Vick scored 26 last week, which surprised me since he had 4 INT's.
September 14, 201214 yr I'm not sure INT's are being deducted this year. Vick scored 26 last week, which surprised me since he had 4 INT's. I just know im down one point so far, but your down 2 players and me only 1.
September 14, 201214 yr I just know im down one point so far, but your down 2 players and me only 1. He rook, check the schedule, you aren't playing me.
September 14, 201214 yr I'm not sure INT's are being deducted this year. Vick scored 26 last week, which surprised me since he had 4 INT's. Just looked at the "League Scoring Rules" page and I think you might be right because it didnt' mention it on there anywhere. Kind of a joke if you ask me, but it is what it is: Fantasy Football: BGP Fantasy Football League - 2012 League Scoring So you don't lose points for fumbles lost or interceptions? Not a huge deal, but something that should be changed for the future in my opinion! (Insert Godot telling me to suggest rule changes in May/June of 2013 haha!). While we are at it, I miss the flex (Insert Godot telling me that he doesn't care and suggest rule changes in May/June 2013 again!) :isurrender::thumb::sssh::lol:
September 14, 201214 yr Just looked at the "League Scoring Rules" page and I think you might be right because it didnt' mention it on there anywhere. Kind of a joke if you ask me, but it is what it is: Fantasy Football: BGP Fantasy Football League - 2012 League Scoring So you don't lose points for fumbles lost or interceptions? Not a huge deal, but something that should be changed for the future in my opinion! (Insert Godot telling me to suggest rule changes in May/June of 2013 haha!). While we are at it, I miss the flex (Insert Godot telling me that he doesn't care and suggest rule changes in May/June 2013 again!) :isurrender::thumb::sssh::lol: It's been like that, I'm not a fan either. I asked about it a few years back.
September 14, 201214 yr Author I noticed that we were not losing points for INT's when I looked at Cutler's score and saw he didn't lose anything for his 4 INT's. With week one in the books we can't change it now. As for fumbles lost I don't think we ever lost points for that. At least we didn't last year.
September 14, 201214 yr It's been like that, I'm not a fan either. I asked about it a few years back. I noticed that we were not losing points for INT's when I looked at Cutler's score and saw he didn't lose anything for his 4 INT's. With week one in the books we can't change it now. As for fumbles lost I don't think we ever lost points for that. At least we didn't last year. I do remember that we never used to lose for fumbles. I'm pretty sure we've lost for inteceptions in the past, but I could be wrong.
September 14, 201214 yr Author I do remember that we never used to lose for fumbles. I'm pretty sure we've lost for inteceptions in the past, but I could be wrong.we did
September 14, 201214 yr You guys need to get a QB like me who doesn't throw interceptions. I would have never noticed the scoring or lack of scoring on int's.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.