Jump to content

HarryDoyle

10 Post Members
  • Posts

    178
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by HarryDoyle

  1. No way the titans part with Haynesworth for Chad because top flight DTs are harder to find than top flight WRs. I still want us to make a move for Robertson from the Jets because I believe he is still available? That puts less pressure to HAVE to take a DT 1st and would allow us to maneuver down and draft a good WR later in 1st rd and stockpile picks. Also wouldn't mind a LB in 1st rd., although our linebackers are shaping up better for next year than last, obviously.

     

    Odom, Ellis, Robertson/Peko, and Geathers across the front is decent. Brooks, Thurman (if he's in shape enough), and Jones (?) at LB are decent. AND our DBs were looking better each game last year.

     

    Here's to eternal optimism in the Queen City!!

  2. Wow...I sense a few Buckeye homers in here...Can we say defensive?[/QUOTE]

     

    You could if you wanted I guess, that is your choice. Come to think of it, I do believe that the Buckeyes were at the top of the defensive ratings in D1 football in the last few years, so "defensive" may be a good term. I personally would call it.....Truthful. :thumb::D

     

    No one imo would be saying anything if Tressel had not claimed and proven ownership of the state of Michigan since he arrived. ;)

     

    All that defense and still lost to LSU...I know...I'm a hater...but I can't help it.

    Wish youall best of luck in '08...bright side for me...yall go undefeated again...SEC gets another title and more stake to the claim that we are the best conference..."IMO".

  3. Like the trade idea, but only for Crayton. Manningham? He just admitted to smoking marijuana, I think it would be a good idea for the Bengals to remove him from their board.

     

    Here's a question: Not likely at all...Bengals need DDD, and more D. But say what if Darren McFadden is on the board win the Bengals pick? Again, he probably won't be, just curious to know how many would want him.

     

    At least he didn't get caught by the fuzz....that's our biggest problem!

    True, but he admitted it and that means he is ready to be a man imo, otherwise he'd try to hide it still...and anyhow, that could've been his freshman year...so give him a break!

  4. Like the trade idea, but only for Crayton. Manningham? He just admitted to smoking marijuana, I think it would be a good idea for the Bengals to remove him from their board.

     

    Here's a question: Not likely at all...Bengals need DDD, and more D. But say what if Darren McFadden is on the board win the Bengals pick? Again, he probably won't be, just curious to know how many would want him.

     

    At least he didn't get caught by the fuzz....that's our biggest problem!

    True, but he admitted it and that means he is ready to be a man imo, otherwise he'd try to hide it still...and anyhow, that could've been his freshman year...so give him a break!

  5. I would love to see us get either Dorsey or Ellis in the draft...but That is a distinct non-possibility...so who do you like? A player? A trade?

     

    1.Dorsey, LSU

    2. Ellis, USC

    3. Rivers, USC-I love this kid!

    4. Kelly, Oklahoma

     

    Food for thought- I love Chad, but heres a possible trade scenario I made up: trade him to Dallas for either Glenn (he's old and injury prone, but still productive) or a guy like Crayton and pick up a 1st rd. pick as well. Everyone wants to say "Moss was only worth a 4th rd. pick..". Well Randy was awful for 2 years before that trade. I will site the Bucs trade for Keyshawn in which they gave up two 1st rd. picks as my evidence to make this deal happen. We then use that 1st rd. pick on a guy like Manningham or the kid from Cal or maybe the kid from Mich. St.

     

    Any thoughts??

  6. At least OJ will play defense..which is more than you can say for most guys of his caliber and exposure...that's what makes him ready to leave college right now above all else.

    1 more year wouldn't have killed him, but I don't disagree with this.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.