Hazard 47 Harlan 7

I don't agree with that I think 2 is better. Only one is not the way to go because some districts are better than others and this gives the 2nd place team a chance to be able to play the first seed in their district again. There has been alot of times that the runner-up the district beat the winner the second time around. I think that this needs to be a thread and this one needs to be closed.

I think 2 teams from wach district is fair. It allows for a good team to stump its toe one week and still have the opportunity to have a state championship as a goal. Also, as has been stated, some districts are just head and shoulders better than other districts so taking 2 teams is very fair. With 2 teams from each district, you are looking at 16 teams total from each class amounting to 96 teams in post season play. That cuts out half of the teams making the playoffs under the current system which would be a financial hit. In many cases, that 4th place team gets a better check from the opposite district's 1rst place team than any home gate they had during the season. This is a debate that has good points on both sides and could go on forever. However, I dont see it changing soon!!:thumb: