30 minutes ago, Calico Jack said:

All fair points.

However, we have the same thing going on within classes. I think we are closer in parody across multiple classes (and, not saying this is the best one, but even the '2x3 Model) than we think.

Male in a 'normal year'? I'd agree. Male vs. Belfry this year? Game on (hsratings.com actually has in their "project a match up" feature.... 28-26 Belfry.

Granted, a projection is just that, but considering their 83.2% projection accuracy for this year through last night, I tend to give those the benefit of the night.

Oh...and the irony in those weekly averages? The lowest projection accuracy numbers for Kentucky? Week 1 -5, aka 'before most district grids start=people playing who they want'.

Week 1-5 ranged from 66%-81%.  Since week 6 (district grid)? 87.1%-92%.  

(Little plug for the 'do away with districts there) ?

I wouldn’t mind getting rid of districts and keeping the six classifications. Tweak the RPI a bit and tell administration and coaches that who you play is how you’ll be seeded. Have a 16 team bracket per class. Would 100% promote competitive scheduling throughout all classes and by removing the extra round of the playoffs, it could open up the option of giving an extra week to schedule games or shortening the season as is. I do like the module though, great work.

Maybe I missed it, but why is the #1 seed playing the 8th seed?  shouldn't the 1 play the 16th, 2nd seed v. 15?  

9 minutes ago, TheBallCoach said:

I wouldn’t mind getting rid of districts and keeping the six classifications. Tweak the RPI a bit and tell administration and coaches that who you play is how you’ll be seeded. Have a 16 team bracket per class. Would 100% promote competitive scheduling throughout all classes and by removing the extra round of the playoffs, it could open up the option of giving an extra week to schedule games or shortening the season as is. I do like the module though, great work.

Yes sir! Thank you! Glad to do it....was fun.

Absolutely and I think that is more realistic in terms of having. The most sense? I don't know. THIS one has gained more traction than I thought (I more or less put this one out there for fun ?)

11 minutes ago, SouthSeas said:

Maybe I missed it, but why is the #1 seed playing the 8th seed?  shouldn't the 1 play the 16th, 2nd seed v. 15?  

ehhh.....it's kind of where a "cross seed" format meets a 'snake seeding' within quadrants. Really moreso a Snake within quadrants.

Frankenstein format as I called it. ?