imsays Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 Maher Rankings | Category Archives: Kentucky Boys 2014key1 geo1 | , geo1 | key2, geo1 CCH 14th and Ryle 15th but I don't think they are that close, CCH should be ranked a little higher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
imsays Posted September 9, 2014 Author Share Posted September 9, 2014 Cooper is 36th, the computer has not warmed to the Jaguars just yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellow Card Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 Maher Rankings | Category Archives: Kentucky Boys 2014key1 geo1 | , geo1 | key2, geo1 CCH 14th and Ryle 15th but I don't think they are that close, CCH should be ranked a little higher. I agree that these two should not be that close to each other. I could see moving CCH up a little, maybe top 10, I think that Ryle is maybe top 25. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellow Card Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 Cooper is 36th, the computer has not warmed to the Jaguars just yet. I think that part of this is because of where they started in the first poll, it's based off of where you ended last year, I think they were in the upper 70's. It looks like they were 61st last week, and they were the biggest mover this week... in both the overall ratings and the where they are ranked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rez Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 According to this, the 10th is a 3 team race. Today's games will be a good measuring stick to see if that is the case. (3) Scott @ (5) Campbell Co (2) Montgomery Co @ (4) GRC Also, Campbell Co travels to Montgomery Co on Thursday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justsayin Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 According to this, the 10th is a 3 team race. Today's games will be a good measuring stick to see if that is the case. (3) Scott @ (5) Campbell Co (2) Montgomery Co @ (4) GRC Also, Campbell Co travels to Montgomery Co on Thursday. It's not obvious whom you believe the three teams are. Please elaborate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unbiasedcoach Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 I think that part of this is because of where they started in the first poll, it's based off of where you ended last year, I think they were in the upper 70's. It looks like they were 61st last week, and they were the biggest mover this week... in both the overall ratings and the where they are ranked. In the beginning of the season everything is based on last year's numbers. As the season progresses and strength of schedule is put in you'll see the numbers get more accurate. Hence, after Cooper had a good week against SK, NCC, and Highlands (who were all higher) you saw the big jump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rez Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 It's not obvious whom you believe the three teams are. Please elaborate. Nothing to do with what I believe, just basing it on the ratings in the poll this thread is based on. Brossard 8.67 Montgomery 8.09 Scott 7.37 GRC 3.85 Campbell 2.76 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellow Card Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 It's not obvious whom you believe the three teams are. Please elaborate. I agree with you, not clear at all, I am guessing that Rez is talking about Bishop Brossart, Scott and MOCO as the 3 teams. With last weeks issues for Scott, I do not think they will be playing at full strength today so the outcome could be a surprise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yellow Card Posted September 9, 2014 Share Posted September 9, 2014 Nothing to do with what I believe, just basing it on the ratings in the poll this thread is based on. Brossard 8.67 Montgomery 8.09 Scott 7.37 GRC 3.85 Campbell 2.76 The point, was not to question the polls, or what you believe.... it was just that your post did not say who the 3 were. Thanks for providing the data in your second post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justsayin Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 The point, was not to question the polls, or what you believe.... it was just that your post did not say who the 3 were. Thanks for providing the data in your second post. yup ... no malice intended ... I was just curious who you thought the 3 were. Thanks for clearing that up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rez Posted September 10, 2014 Share Posted September 10, 2014 yup ... no malice intended ... I was just curious who you thought the 3 were. Thanks for clearing that up. Sounds good. I just didn't want to give the impression it was my thinking, because I'm not informed enough to have a valid ranking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts