Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Rule Question

Featured Replies

Start of the 3rd quarter. Team A has possession to start the quarter. The ref A tells Team B it is their ball and incorrectly gives them the ball. Team B has 6 players on the court also. Coaches for Team A tells ref B it is their ball to start the quarter. Team B inbounds the ball. Ref B stops the game and starts the quarter and correctly gives Team A the ball. Team B gets their 6th player off the court.

 

Should a technical foul been called on Team B for having 6 players on the court?

Did the officials ever notice that 6 were on the floor?

 

If so and the ball was put in play with 6 I can't think of any reason it's not a T.

 

Multiple screwups there.

Once the ball is put into play (becomes live), the possession mistake can not be corrected. Yes it should have been a technical on Team B if the infraction was discovered at that time. No way do you have a "redo".

  • Author

They stopped play. Awarded Team A the ball. Started the quarter over and never called a technical.

 

Yes. They noticed there was 6 and said that because when team A inbounded the ball there wasn't 6 players on the court and that during.a dead ball they can get that player off. They said since there was a possession screw up it became a dead ball even though team B had inbounded the ball with 6 on the court.

Once the ball is put into play (becomes live), the possession mistake can not be corrected. Yes it should have been a technical on Team B if the infraction was discovered at that time. No way do you have a "redo".

 

As usual, Madman is all over it. It is not a "Correctable Error." You play on.

  • Author

Sad part is that in an earlier game these same 2 refs had a situation where bonus free throws were incorrectly awarded. The first shot was made. The found out the free throws shouldn't have been shot. They counted the made free throw and then went to the possession arrow to award possession of the ball instead of shooting the second free throw.

 

They didn't correct the mistake that time but they erased play and corrected the mistake the second time.

Sad part is that in an earlier game these same 2 refs had a situation where bonus free throws were incorrectly awarded. The first shot was made. The found out the free throws shouldn't have been shot. They counted the made free throw and then went to the possession arrow to award possession of the ball instead of shooting the second free throw.

 

They didn't correct the mistake that time but they erased play and corrected the mistake the second time.

 

Now you're getting into the "Correctable Error" portion of the rulebook.

 

What happened from the time the free throw was attempted upto the time they discovered their error?

  • Author
Now you're getting into the "Correctable Error" portion of the rulebook.

 

What happened from the time the free throw was attempted upto the time they discovered their error?

 

Nothing. After the free throw was made the home team rang the horn and called the refs over to say that there were only 5 team fouls and not 7. The home(official) scorer had 5 team fouls recorded and the visitor's scorer had 7 team fouls. Officials have to go by the official scorer's book. Once they decided there were only 5 team fouls they counted the free throw since it had been shot and made legally at the time and went to the possession arrow to award possession.

 

The visiting team scorer was the one who told the refs it was bonus free throw time and refs allowed the bonus free throws to take place. It is my understanding that the visiting scorer had the correct team fouls for both teams after all fouls were added up in both books but at the time the official scorebook wasn't correct.

Nothing. After the free throw was made the home team rang the horn and called the refs over to say that there were only 5 team fouls and not 7. The home(official) scorer had 5 team fouls recorded and the visitor's scorer had 7 team fouls. Officials have to go by the official scorer's book. Once they decided there were only 5 team fouls they counted the free throw since it had been shot and made legally at the time and went to the possession arrow to award possession.

 

The visiting team scorer was the one who told the refs it was bonus free throw time and refs allowed the bonus free throws to take place. It is my understanding that the visiting scorer had the correct team fouls for both teams after all fouls were added up in both books but at the time the official scorebook wasn't correct.

 

After they made their determination that the official book was correct, the point should have been erased and since their was no bonus, ball is out of bounds for a throw in.

  • Author
After they made their determination that the official book was correct, the point should have been erased and since their was no bonus, ball is out of bounds for a throw in.

 

That's what I thought should happen. Seemed like the fair thing to do.

 

Amazing how how the same crew can mess up two correctable moments like that in two different games.

 

There isn't enough money in the world to get me to referee a game. No way. I don't envy those guys.

That's what I thought should happen. Seemed like the fair thing to do.

 

Amazing how how the same crew can mess up two correctable moments like that in two different games.

 

There isn't enough money in the world to get me to referee a game. No way. I don't envy those guys.

 

It's not as easy as "fair thing to do."

 

Let's change it. FTs awarded incorrectly to A1. Makes both. B1 throws it inbounds. B2 scores a bucket. A1 throws it into A2 who is now fouled. Books says "oops that's only 6 so we should not have had the previous FTs."

 

By rule it's too late. That unmerited FTs count. There are only certain events that are even correctable and FTs make up the bulk of that list. However, it has to be caught before the ball becomes live after the 2nd dead ball. In my example, the first dead ball was the 2nd made FT and the 2nd dead ball was the basket made by B. Once A then threw it back in (ie made it "live) it's too late to correct those FTs.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.