I don't need to read the thread. My facts are easy to follow, you said Newport and Lloyd were underachievers. I pointed out that both had beaten Ludlow, which then makes them the biggest underachiever to this point in the year. It's follow point A to point B logic, easy stuff.

 

Ludlow isn't even on my radar most of the time..

Ludlow isn't even on my radar most of the time, but if you're going to call out other schools as being underachievers, you may want to make sure your own school is doing okay first. :thumb:

 

:confused: Maybe you should go back and re-read one of your post. O.K. Sandy.

I simply made an observation regarding the 2 teams in the thread Newport/Lloyd. IMO they have underachieved. You haven't said if you agree or disagree. You just want to throw Ludlow into the mix. Thread is not about them. Start a thread about underachieving teams and put Ludlow at the top of your list if you wish. Starting a thread is pretty easy, just follow point A to point B, easy stuff or so you say. Are you getting my point.. :jump: :walk:

:confused: Maybe you should go back and re-read one of your post. O.K. Sandy.

I simply made an observation regarding the 2 teams in the thread Newport/Lloyd. IMO they have underachieved. You haven't said if you agree or disagree. You just want to throw Ludlow into the mix. Thread is not about them. Start a thread about underachieving teams and put Ludlow at the top of your list if you wish. Starting a thread is pretty easy, just follow point A to point B, easy stuff or so you say. Are you getting my point.. :jump: :walk:

 

I'd go easy on the Sandy stuff if I were you, pretty sure it's a violation of rules and can lead to suspension. :thumb:

 

The thread was about the Newport versus Lloyd game. You offered no analysis or details from the game, simply wanted to drop in and call them underachievers. Pretty sure that contributed nothing to the thread about the actual game, just a chance for a cheap shot by you to two other schools. So don't tell me what the thread is about.

 

I started this simply pointing out that Ludlow has lost to both, thus making them an even bigger underachiever in the eyes of many. Don't you agree. It's points A,B, and C logic. And you started the whole underachiever thing.

:laugh:

I'd go easy on the Sandy :laugh: stuff if I were you, pretty sure it's a violation of rules and can lead to suspension. :thumb:

 

The thread was about the Newport versus Lloyd game. You offered no analysis or details from the game, simply wanted to drop in and call them underachievers. Pretty sure that contributed nothing to the thread about the actual game, just a chance for a cheap shot by you to two other schools. So don't tell me what the thread is about.

 

I started this simply pointing out that Ludlow has lost to both, thus making them an even bigger underachiever in the eyes of many. Don't you agree. It's points A,B, and C logic. And you started the whole underachiever thing.

 

:laugh: :laugh: A, B and now C logic. Very impressive.. :walk: