Jump to content

mr wong

Suspended
  • Posts

    225
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by mr wong

  1. I can't even begin to tell you how wrong you are in this manner but I'll try to make some finer points.

    A global flood would leave tons of evidence. There is none.

    A global flood would deposit a single huge layer of silt with fossils of all species that lived on the Earth at that time in it. Assuming that the Earth is 6,000 years old and Adam and Eve rode on dinosaurs we'd see human, dino, dog, whale, etc fossils in the same layer. That doesn't exist. A flood would not produce the clear layers of fossilized life that we see in rock strata today.

     

    You also need a source of water. There is none.

    Now, could God have created a flood, and then made all the evidence vanish leaving a world that pointed to the contrary? Sure, it's God. But did he do that? I don't think God wants to confuse us that much.

     

     

    No evidence. Are you kidding? The Grand Canyon can only be formed by the flood. I don't think that little creek of a river carved it. The vast fossil layer we have is evidence of a flood. Fossilization is a rare event. YOu don't see too many fossils forming today do you? We wouldn't have to see dinosaurs buried together with humans. WHen the flood was coming down, I'm sure the humans were smart enough to head to higher ground.

     

    You say we need a source of water? Have you read the all 3 chapters pertainging to the flood? THe fountains of the deep were opened. THe floodgate of Heaven were opened...unleashing the water canopy God placed above the earth (See what God did on day 2 of creation). God told us how he did it. Confusion only comes when we accept man's "scientific opinion instead of what God sais happened...he was there.

  2. Where do you get that? I am a Christian but don't accept a global flood or 6,000 year old Earth b/c there is no evidence for it. I see the flood as an allegorical parable much like the prodigal son.

     

    YOu think the Flood is a parable? DO you know why GOd brought the flood? Read the beginning of Genesis chapter 6. Everyone was wicked during those days. The Flood was GOd's judgment on the world. He destroyed it all except Noah's family and 2 of every kind. In 2 Peter we learn that GOd judged the World with water last time and he's going to do it with fire next time. Based on your thinking. God didn't judge the world then and he's not going to in the future.

  3. Let's just say that my "understanding" of erosional and depositional processes evidently differs from yours...and fortunately I am free to believe what my mind and heart tell me, so I can agree with all scientific evidence that shows the Earth to be 4.6 billion years old AND I can believe in a flooding event of biblical proportions.

     

    THe scientific evidence you speak of denies a global flood. It is not scientific becuase it is based on assumptions. Taking things you can't prove either way and saying they are fact does not make it science. And the flood in Biblical proportions is global. Such a catastrohpic event wipes away anything laid down by millions of years.

  4. Wow...I don't know how you took my one line in the one post I made as a personal attack. But then again, since I believe that the Earth is 4.6 billion years old and you believe that Noah incubated dino eggs, we probably do not see things the same way.

     

    I didn't take it as a personal attack, I was pointing out that your debate tactics at the time seemed to be make me look like I had an underlying assumption that people need to know english to be saved, which I don't. Sorry if you took that the weong way. And you are right, we don't see things the same. Obviously you deny a global flood if you accpet one at all. I believe the Bible and that the earth is 6,000 years old. Dinosuars had to be on the ark because God sent 2 of every kind to Noah to take on the ark.

  5. So they must learn English first before they can be saved?

     

    umm... No. I didn't say that anywhere and I really dom't want to answer silly questions that you try to atttack me with that I never said and when you are avoiding my main points. But since this is supposed to be a creation thread, and that's where my passion lies, lets get back to it. For the Genesis skeptics out there, when can't Genesis be literal history?

  6. I'm afraid we are thread jacking here but you can't produce a speck of historical evidence that points to the KJV as the ONLY word of God. There is also no scriptural evidence either. Furthermore you just alienated most of the world because do they too not deserve a Bible of "their" language that is like yours?

     

    SO who are you submitted to? The word of God or man? I don't need to historical evidence to back anything that God tells me. Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God, at least my Bible says so. And How have I alienated the world? Since the Lord is willing that all should come to repentance I think he can get his Word out.

  7. THe Apocrypha was never considered to be inspired by God. It was betweeen the testaments and the true Christians were submitted to God's authority, not man's. As for the manuscripts and such that everyone thinks we keed to go back to, God said his word would endure forever, not the Greek maunscript. If I believe what God says, which I do, then we must have God's word available us today in the exact way that he would want us to have, and thats in the KJV.

  8. The University of Kentucky was my school for 50 years before Billiy Clyde came and will be when he is gone. If, and I said If half of these rumors are true I do not have to support him. I can support the university and team without supporting every employee there. I do not have to leave and support someone else becauce we may have made a mistake and hired a jerk

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.