That is an interesting take and observation. The reality is that many upperclassmen didn’t come back this past season while he was still at the helm. After this season, many more current players were planning on not returning if he was still in charge. Not sure how that makes it a great fit for the program. This would’ve been enough girls exiting to put the program in a place that could possibly question if they would field a team next year. So walking away after the season is what is being advertised, but in reality, I would assume, there wasn’t an option for him to return. There is, without question, a lot of youth on that team but a role of the head of the program is to develop that young talent. The other item left out was the injuries that plagued the team. Losing your best player and never having a contributing upperclassman because of injury hurts. All the more reason to develop and adapt. That just didn’t seem to happen. It seems as if the coach was a lot of talk without substance or ability to back it up. Anyone that followed the team the past few years could see the inability for the coach to adapt to close out games or develop the team to compete in games. His coaching knowledge of X’s and O’s and developing just didn’t exist or was elementary at best. The players seemed to not develop much or become disinterested under his tutelage. He had a couple of talented assistants that, for whatever reason, seemed to not have much input or voice that was given a chance. The coach, without a doubt, loved being the head coach and was a rah-rah guy but facts are facts. His previous head coaching job at Calvary Christian ended just as this one would’ve, not enough players wanting to come out for the a team he was the head coach of. Beechwood was in fear to have the same thing happen.