halfback20

Is it not part of the entire problem that someone possibly called on Arbery but not other people that did the same thing?

“And he’s been caught on camera a bunch at night. It’s kind of an ongoing thing. The man building the house has got heart issues. I think he’s not going to finish it.” https://thebrunswicknews.com/news/local_news/dispatcher-what-was-he-doing-wrong/article_fe51cdd4-3bb6-5815-9dec-ddcdc8f879f8.html It raises a lot of questions. He seemed to know a lot about the cameras. How'd he know the guy there had been there before? Did he have camera access? Did he know others had been there? Did he call on others?

Irrelevant to what happened that day. Someone called with knowledge that he had been in the house before and said it was an "ongoing problem". How did they know who was there and that it was an ongoing problem? If they knew he had been there before they knew others had too right? Why didn't they call on other people? I don't know for sure but its possible the homeowner is just distancing himself from people who took things way too far. Hopefully we find out.

Someone called while he was in the house and mentioned that he had been there on camera a bunch and it was an ongoing problem. Person mentioned the homeowner is sick and probably isn't going to finish the house. Made me think they know him or are taking care of the house, because they knew so much. If they called police on him and no one else that was in the house they're pay of the problem. Obviously the people who chased him down and shot him are the bigger problem.

Someone associated with the house did though right?

Did the homeowner call police on all of them? Because he did call them on Arbery didn't he? If he called on Arbery and not on anyone else, he is part of the problem. Maybe I'm mistaken and he didn't call them.

Right, but the DUI driver wouldn't cause everyone to lose their rights. That was my point. I get what you mean now though.

That's one thing people don't think about. Laws are different everywhere.

I don't see the logic of saying these two are an example of why people shouldn't be able to own guns. That's like saying a DUI driver who crashes and kills a family in another car is an example of why people shouldn't be allowed to drive. They messed up, not me. Fwiw, I think they will try some kind of self defense argument. I don't think it will work.

I answered the question, you just didn't like the answer.

I can respond whether you ask for my specific opinion or not.

:lol2: So you were wrong about the Dallas officer and my comments. Also, I'm not tearing down the victim. I've said countless times that even if he was doing something wrong in that house it's not a reason to kill him. I never rationalized anything, so you are wrong again.

Are you even reading what I am saying? What are you talking about? I didn't say anything about what others would believe, I said I can only speak for me.

I said before I can't speak for anyone else. But my experiences with people in my lifetime have shown me there are a lot of white people that would steal from their dying grandma.

You mean when I said this, chief ? I never once argued she was innocent or did nothing wrong. Think you're thinking of someone else.