http://www.thepostgame.com/features/201107/usain-bolt-case-study-science-sprinting

http://www.thepostgame.com/features/201107/usain-bolt-case-study-science-sprinting

 

Not sure this is anything new.

I think that anyone involved in the sport who understands the physical force and movement in a short sprint knows most of this.

The part that bothers me .... Is that this article does not speak to the fact that different runners have a different physical make up than Bolt. Which means that this joker hasn't determined the true key to speed. He may have found that for Bolt ... But not everyone.

 

And it doesn't even mention the real reason for Bolts success .... PED's.

99 out of 100 pro runners are doped to the gills.

If you don't believe that ... I am willing to sell the Golden Gate Bridge to the first buyer for $5.00

Not sure this is anything new.

I think that anyone involved in the sport who understands the physical force and movement in a short sprint knows most of this.

The part that bothers me .... Is that this article does not speak to the fact that different runners have a different physical make up than Bolt. Which means that this joker hasn't determined the true key to speed. He may have found that for Bolt ... But not everyone.

 

And it doesn't even mention the real reason for Bolts success .... PED's.

99 out of 100 pro runners are doped to the gills.

If you don't believe that ... I am willing to sell the Golden Gate Bridge to the first buyer for $5.00

 

It's new to those of us who never really thought about it.

 

Do you agree that most runners' legs move at the same speed? I think that's what most uniformed (me) people would be surprised to know.

It's new to those of us who never really thought about it.

 

Do you agree that most runners' legs move at the same speed? I think that's what most uniformed (me) people would be surprised to know.

 

Most .... Definitely NO. Some .... YES.

What this guy has described is what most of us refer to as turnover.

He just comes at it from a different angle (a very unimportant one at that) so it sounds like something different than what it actually is.

The one thin that he didn't really touch on enough with Bolt is stride length.

His legs may move at the same speed .... But you could immediately argue that this fact combined with stride length is also why Bolt blows away his competition. (The average elite sprinter is

This is just another guy trying to make a name for himself. (And I can't stress enough ... Bolt is so juiced you may as well call him orange)

Most .... Definitely NO. Some .... YES.

What this guy has described is what most of us refer to as turnover.

He just comes at it from a different angle (a very unimportant one at that) so it sounds like something different than what it actually is.

The one thin that he didn't really touch on enough with Bolt is stride length.

His legs may move at the same speed .... But you could immediately argue that this fact combined with stride length is also why Bolt blows away his competition. (The average elite sprinter is

This is just another guy trying to make a name for himself. (And I can't stress enough ... Bolt is so juiced you may as well call him orange)

 

I seem to remember him talking about stride length. Something like 3 strides less than the average runner.