Boone County 3 Ryle 1

[Yellow Card]

Good call on this one Oldgrappler!!! :clap:

 

I will leave the details to you, I did hear that Boone scored 2 early goals off of defensive lapses by Ryle and the Rebels were not really threatened in this one.

[oldgrappler]

You beat me to it, Yellow Card. Your short summary is very accurate. Senior Dane Thamann scored the first goal off of a great feed by sophomore Nate Rice. Suarez scored in short order for the second goal off of one of Gascon's long throw-ins. Thamann had a header on a Brock corner kick for the third Boone goal.

 

Near the beginning of the match, I think around the 5 minute mark a Ryle player was chasing the ball towards the Boone goal. Boone keeper came out to dive on the ball just before the Ryle player got there. Keep got there first. Ryle player's legs were taken out by Keep and a Boone defender trailing the play also had his legs taken out and fell hard into the back of the Ryle player. Boone defender was given a red card immediately. It could have been a no call. It could have been a yellow card on Boone. Hey, I've seen that kind of play go against the opponent for going into the keeper. I didn't think a red card was called for. It seemed to me it all happened in the flow of the play and the goalie caused the whole thing and he got there first and so no call would have been appropriate.

 

So Boone played down a player for 75 of the 80 minutes played. Boone defense played very well most of the game and the offense had two quick scores early. Added another score I think in first half, but I don't recall if it was 1st or 2nd half. Ryle got their goal with about 16 minutes left in the 1st half. Ryle player shot on goal and it hit one of the Boone players and went into the net. Looked like an own-goal but had the Boone player not touched the ball it would have gone in any way. Is that technically an own-goal? Ryle also had a shot bounce off the top bar of the goal.

 

I must mention two players for Ryle. #7 and #17 both are solid players and played very well for the Raiders. I congratulate them on their good effort.

 

One last thing. Boone again arranged for fantastic weather for the fans in Rebel's home stadium.

[bothways]

You beat me to it, Yellow Card. Your short summary is very accurate. Senior Dane Thamann scored the first goal off of a great feed by sophomore Nate Rice. Suarez scored in short order for the second goal off of one of Gascon's long throw-ins. Thamann had a header on a Brock corner kick for the third Boone goal.

 

Near the beginning of the match, I think around the 5 minute mark a Ryle player was chasing the ball towards the Boone goal. Boone keeper came out to dive on the ball just before the Ryle player got there. Keep got there first. Ryle player's legs were taken out by Keep and a Boone defender trailing the play also had his legs taken out and fell hard into the back of the Ryle player. Boone defender was given a red card immediately. It could have been a no call. It could have been a yellow card on Boone. Hey, I've seen that kind of play go against the opponent for going into the keeper. I didn't think a red card was called for. It seemed to me it all happened in the flow of the play and the goalie caused the whole thing and he got there first and so no call would have been appropriate.

 

So Boone played down a player for 75 of the 80 minutes played. Boone defense played very well most of the game and the offense had two quick scores early. Added another score I think in first half, but I don't recall if it was 1st or 2nd half. Ryle got their goal with about 16 minutes left in the 1st half. Ryle player shot on goal and it hit one of the Boone players and went into the net. Looked like an own-goal but had the Boone player not touched the ball it would have gone in any way. Is that technically an own-goal? Ryle also had a shot bounce off the top bar of the goal.

 

I must mention two players for Ryle. #7 and #17 both are solid players and played very well for the Raiders. I congratulate them on their good effort.

 

One last thing. Boone again arranged for fantastic weather for the fans in Rebel's home stadium.

 

I agree with this assessment other than the red card. That was a classic foul to deny a goal. The defender clipped the attackers legs before the keeper got there and that is what caused the subsequent collision. Easy red card. If you notice there really wasn't a whole lot of arguing from the players either.

[oldgrappler]

I agree with this assessment other than the red card. That was a classic foul to deny a goal. The defender clipped the attackers legs before the keeper got there and that is what caused the subsequent collision. Easy red card. If you notice there really wasn't a whole lot of arguing from the players either.

 

I don't think that is what happened. It didn't appear so from my vantage (all the way up near the top of the stands). I believe the keep arrived first, Ryle player tripped over Boone keeper, and second Boone player went hard into Ryle player. The reason there was no arguing from the boys is that 4 or 5 of them just recently were reinstated after a five game suspension imposed by the coach for getting red cards by arguing with the ref. NOBODY was going to say anything, though the Boone players were standing together with looks of "you gotta be kidding me". You did see the coach react and jaw with the ref. Browning rarely ever does that. I think he thought it was a bad call. I felt for the kid who got the card. Another 2 games on the bench.

 

Now mind you, I do see how the ref would call it a foul. I think some other options were available to him as stated in my first post. The red card came out fast on this one. IMHO. I do leave room that I may be wrong on this and I may not have seen the sequence of events correctly. I do know three boys laid on the grass in a heap. Thankfully, no one was injured.

[bothways]

Fair enough, I actually was down on that end and i stick by it being the right call. All that being said, if you do call that a foul it has to be a red card, no question.

[Codor FC]

I believe this situation is like minimum sentencing. If a there is foul in the box that negates a scoring opportunity it has to to be a red.

[bothways]

I believe this situation is like minimum sentencing. If a there is foul in the box that negates a scoring opportunity it has to to be a red.

 

It doesn't have to be in the box but essentially yes I think that's how it works, unless advantage is played and the goal is scored.