Jump to content

born2reign

Former Member
  • Posts

    3,601
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by born2reign

  1. I dont think you get my point, what was there to review in the first place, seems like the right call to me.

     

    Based on my understanding of the rule and the reporting that has been done over the last 24 hours, there are specific parameters that are outlined for calling a technical foul.

     

    I think the review can clarify the grey area that can come with "common sense" rulings. Where does referee discretion begin and letter of the law end. If this scenario is posed again, what are the options for the ref?

  2. With all the discussion about the Humphries technical, it should be pointed out that even if no T was called, the game was still far from over. Regardless of what happened on the Humphries free throws, it was still going to be a one possession game. Who knows how that would have played out? You can't say that play won or lost a game.

     

    ESPN does this statistical analysis called Win Probability. Games are analyzed based on specific scenarios and the chances of winning are determined based on this analysis. I wonder how the win probability would have been impacted based on the various scenarios at the end of the game.

     

    That called technical must have shifted the win probability dramatically, I bet.

  3. Not sure. That's why I posed the question. If that's the case, I get it. If not, how is Willis not the guy there?

     

    I think Cal could have chosen anyone not on the floor. The issue would have been Willis' ankle. Could he have shot free throws with the injury? Plus, what if he missed the second and had to get back on defense? He couldn't have been a viable option, IMO.

  4. The bacon was perfect. Like I said, the idea could use some tinkering.

     

    I do think there is a correlation though. How many jobs can you go in making a million per year without a diploma? How do they decide who is deserving of said jobs? I don't know the answer to the first question, but the answer to the second is qualifications.

     

    Anyone can be an entrepreneur in this great country of ours without a degree. Didn't Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerburg both drop out of college to pursue their companies? Those dudes declared early for life and it worked out well for them.

     

    My point is that a degree doesn't correlate to success in the NBA, so I can't see the logic behind requiring a degree. In many aspects of the working world, we don't require the degree. Basketball mirrors many of those careers. The amount of money generated by the players has zero to do with the degree they would receive, so I can't see the sense in forcing this route on players.

  5. Analysts over analyze the ones who could be great.......He is tentative at times.......because he is a very young guy........I will agree the coaching at LSU is bizarre at times..............Irregardless dont quit in the middle at anything..........There isnt an analyst who wouldnt take him #1 and give you the next 2 picks.

    I agree with everything you said here. Even agree with the part about quitting.

     

    This being said, I am seperating the emotion from the logical reasoning. Ben put in his time and played hard for two thirds of the season. He has nothing left to prove, but more importantly he has nothing left to gain playing out the string. We actually see this all the time in sport. Time to hang it up and declare, if one and done is his intention.

  6. Just some food for thought. Coming in to todays game Simmons had almost 100 more shot attempts to the next closest player on the team. Obviously he is the leading scorer, rebounder, shot blocker, assist leader, steal leader, and turnover leader. Today his touches were limited. He was 6 gf 7 from the field and had 9 rebounds. I would think Oklahoma did a decent job on him, yet were on the ropes because the 2 guards Quarterman and Blakeny were 8 for 10 from 3 point range. If a guy has 100 more shots than anyone else on his team, I would think some offense is undoubtedly being run through him......More importantly Simmons chose LSU, just like the 6er's will chose him...............He may rather play at LSU if that is the alternative

    If your argument for why he should keep playing is about 5 more shot attempts per game and playing for the Sixers, then I strongly disagree.

     

    1. Regardless of if he declares in the next 30 seconds or finishes the season, the Sixers are a possible destination.

     

    2. Even with 100 more shot attempts, the analysts today said Simmons isn't aggressive enough (and, mind you, his team was winning by double digits at the time). Today was not the first time this has happened. Check his box scores. Watch his games. His team mates freeze him out, unimaginably. His coach doesn't feature him, unfathomably. People are nitpicking his game for things that aren't in his control, IMO.

  7. We live in such a decaying society........Whether this guy finishes the year or not palying he is the @1 pick. How about learning to deal with adversity, jealousy, highs and lows. How about learning to be a leader and a good teammate. Weve got juniors in HS basically graduating early to get to college so they can leave early to go pro and be there 3 years and never even earn a pension. Hey money is great (by the way Ben is pretty good financially compared to most folks), but the overall hs and college experience on and off the court or arena is priceless.

    If his team mates won't follow, he can't lead. If his coach won't provide the opportunities, he can't be a good team mate.

     

    His opportunity has nothing to do with a decaying society or a high school junior's opportunity. That really is a red herring, IMO.

     

    The bottom line is he is not in a situation that is good for his future development as a player. He has dealt with 20 games of adversity. He has learned lessons. He put in enough to cement his place at the top of the NBA Draft board.

     

    Ben Simmons is being failed by LSU. His team mates get time in front of NBA scouts because of him. His coach is not developing him as a basketball player as he should. LSU makes hundreds of thousands, if not over a million, dollars in merchandise, ticket sales and tv revenues because of him. He is getting the short end of the stick. Time to cut bait. It isn't about emotion, it is about reason, IMO.

  8. I remember a couple years ago, there was a long drink of water with a unique eyebrow that never had plays run for him either. .........So he rebounded, dunked and blocked his way to a national championship, national player of the year and overall #1 pick (while only attempting the 5th most shots on the team..............I think that would be a good model for young Ben to follow.............:popcorn:

    What in the world makes anyone think that Ben Simmons plays on a team that is anywhere close to the team that Anthony Davis played for? He doesn't. That is a part of my argument.

     

    Davis played with the number 2 pick in the draft and multiple other first round picks so that he could showcase his full abilities. He also played for a coach that knew how to utilize his unique defensive prowess. Simmons plays with guys that don't get him the ball in crunch time. One of his best attributes is his passing ability. The coach doesn't draw up enough plays for him to be a facilitator and his team mates show no sense of urgency to get him the ball. Again, this is a part of my argument.

     

    Facts are what they are, IMO. He has played two thirds of the season. He has nothing left to prove or gain playing for this LSU team and a lot at risk. It is time to move on, IMO.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.