YAKOFNORWEGIA Posted August 18, 2009 Posted August 18, 2009 Here's a question, Dakota Euton was initially ruled ineligible because of something about choosing his school after the family moved based on athletics. If these athletes indeed leave Rose Hill and are touring various schools and talking to the coaches would this make them ineligible? One more, one of the kids mentioned is the Rose Hill basketball coaches son, correct?
spindoc Posted August 18, 2009 Posted August 18, 2009 Here's a question, Dakota Euton was initially ruled ineligible because of something about choosing his school after the family moved based on athletics. If these athletes indeed leave Rose Hill and are touring various schools and talking to the coaches would this make them ineligible? One more, one of the kids mentioned is the Rose Hill basketball coaches son, correct? By rule, Dakotah was ruled ineligible. Had nothing to do with the school choice or Clay's comments. All athletes are ruled the same and have to prove the move met the exception requirements. And from a reliable source, albeit not a very attractive one, I was told that all the RH boys were in their schoolbells on Monday, minus Terry. Ram had all the bylaws out during that fiasco, I'll try to find them.
YAKOFNORWEGIA Posted August 18, 2009 Author Posted August 18, 2009 Just like the creek, stretches of rapids and stretches of long calm pools. Hmmm makes me want to go fishing. I hope that when the dust settles it can be BAU for everyone. I have enough to worry about with my own. Don't have any more curiosity or questions. Thanks for the info.
.png.ffa34568722b20f38e3c3ecfcb9a2cd2.png)
.thumb.jpeg.64622635ae2a7585f3b2ce8689c5c6e8(2).thumb.jpeg.d7ac8545049bed7455b5b1792e04b782.thumb.jpeg.eeaea514079dadad3f01f2b35437c9fb.jpeg)
Recommended Posts