TRIPLETHREAT

We have a winner. :banana:

You still haven't addressed my points. How is it that many highly touted athletes end up at at Catholic? While basketball and sports may be of little importance to most people going to Catholic , It is of great importance to the administration. Basketball, in many schools,is a primary revenue generator for other non-revenue sports. Why should the privates have a different set of eligibility rules? Please enlighten me.

Re-read the post. It is not a Fayette County boe policy that is the constraint. It is the KHSAA.

I agree. I am against the split. But things are not equal. What if, as a parent , the best school for my child is Tates Creek? I am constrained by the current system. I have one option: 1) sell my house and move into their district .

.......and if you can play hoops...come on down !!!!!!!

Change of address for one.

If you see no problem with it, why shouldn't these players be allowed to attend the school of their chioce? Athletes who enroll at Catholic are not subjected to meet the same qualifications of eligibility if they enrolled at a public school. Have you not been paying attention?

Agreed ...not a mass exodus. However, when you have the cream of the crop, mass numbers are not needed. Here is a list of players from public schools (not coming from a parochial school feeder) that have played boys basketball in recent years at Catholic. These are just the ones I can remember....feel free to add others as i am sure you can . Brendan Woody Demetrius Green Harrison Morton William Graham Brian Smith

No. There are no private high schools affilliated with the KHSAA in Franklin County,or any of the surrounding counties. Here is a list of surrounding counties: Owen, Scott, Woodford, Anderson, Shelby, Henry. The problem is this: Because of the regulations of the KHSAA in addition to the enrollment poilcy of Lex. Cath., many local schools have seen their top athletes travel two counties away to attend LCHS. In addition, many Lexington public schools have seen thier "In-district" athletes opt for the Knights. There are a lot of people that have a bad taste in thier mouths after being drubbed by a team that has a clear and competive advantage because of the policies. The vote (although I oppose it) , was simply a message sent by the member schools to the KHSAA that they have endured enough, and want some tighter restrictions.

Lex. Cath. is a GREAT choice for those so serious about wanting to keep their kids in a Catholic School. But i wonder if they would have still made that choice if they weren't allowed to participate in varsity sports. I do know this: the older brother of that LCHS girls' squad (who wasn't nearly the athlete) didn't make that drive to Lexington. Two others mentioned in the article on the boys squad (Brendan Woody and Will Graham) aren't Catholic. :lol:

This article was in The Frankfort paper today. http://www.state-journal.com/article.php?pathToFile=/articles//sports/&file=_sports2.txt&article=1&tD= The full article states that during the 2005 girls 11th regional playoff, ther were 8 players from frankfort on the floor at one time. Five with Franklin County jerseys and 3 wearing Lexington Catholic. Although I am against seperating the public/private schools, this is laughable. Oh.........and here's some credit to Lex. Cath !!!!!

I must be seeing things then. Maybe I need to take my medication.

Do they have a shuttle bus?

With all due respect ALLWORKNOPLAY, there are other schools outside Northern Ky. Many have (and still do) some or all of these practices.

#5 is true....not false....the "bus" referenced is a small passenger bus with bench seats. Holds about 10.

Rockmom----I was trying not to be specific about naming schools. :thumb:

Point by point, somebody tell me if there are any falsehoods here. 1. Both Public and Private schools in Kentucky recruit players. 2. Jobs are offered to players parents in the county or city of the school in order to have an official change of residence. 3. Some parents actually choose to move based solely on athletic reasons. 4. Private schools generally have an easier time recruiting. 5. Some private institutions send busses two or three counties away each morning to pick up their star players. 6. Some public institutions knowingly submit a false address in order to make a student eligible. My point is this: There will always be inequities in consideration to the ease of recruiting of a player. People will continue to find ways to make kids eligible. Consider a rural community with no manufacturing jobs as opposed to an urban area. There will be more opportunities to find work for the parents in the urban setting. Therefore, the urban public schools would have a competitive advantage over the rural public schools. What do you do then? Is there a solution? In my opinion , YES. Change the rules for everyone. The way to solve the the problem is to make the rule cut and dry. Something like this: Each high school athlete is allowed 1 transfer during his varsity career. One and one only. Sure there are a few details to work out, but both sides recruit. Their means of recruiting are different only because of the limitations the current system.