CKC Posted July 26, 2015 Share Posted July 26, 2015 ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Grimes Posted July 27, 2015 Share Posted July 27, 2015 1 Campbell 2 Scott 3 Brossart the rest.... Thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CKC Posted July 27, 2015 Author Share Posted July 27, 2015 I think Brossart may be a little closer to Scott than most people think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thorocamel Posted July 27, 2015 Share Posted July 27, 2015 though very tight - I would flip flop brossart over scott this year and Brossart Campbell games are typically down to a missed free throw or a late turnover. District is wide open imo..Campbell loaded at guard and Brossart loaded down low and Scott is very talented.. Should be interesting.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CKC Posted July 28, 2015 Author Share Posted July 28, 2015 While I agree Brossart and Campbell can have close games, I think Campbell has the edge, they won districts last year by 21 and only lose one starter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTrunick Posted August 28, 2015 Share Posted August 28, 2015 1. Campbell County - This club will be a match up problem for a lot of teams, there is talk on getting some other athletes out which will help the depth. This is the year for Campbell as their seniors and sophomores compliment each other. 2. Scott - They have some solid players but lost some valuable seniors last year. IMO they are the second seed in the district just more skilled than the Mustangs. 3. Brossart - Question mark will be their guards but everybody in the region knows that. They have athletic girls filling out those guard positions who should play with a chip on their shoulders for the Mustangs. IMO sleeper in this district. 4. Field - the other teams in the district are just over matched by the big 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts