Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Highlands is a running team that can pass when and if they need to. They will definitely not benefit from any inclimate weather, but being a running team, it helps with the weather.

Posted
Highlands is a running team that can pass when and if they need to. They will definitely not benefit from any inclimate weather, but being a running team, it helps with the weather.

Highlands is a running team that likes to use speed over power this year though aren't they? Which even on the turf the speed is still nto hurt as bad during the rain. It could possibly help Belfry running the ball.

But I think on the turf it dont really matter, it's simple run or throw hold on to the football.

Posted

Rain would not be good for NCC with how they spread them out and throw it around... however 2 years ago when they played mayfield in the rain with a similar offense they absolutly dominated

Posted

I don't think the weather bothers Highland's at all. They practice on field turf every day rain or shine. HHS is more of a running team and weather usually won't effect a running team as much as a team that passes. A passing team might have a advantage on natural turf with recievers but this game is being played field turf.

Posted
If it rains or snows it could be devistating for Lone Oak.

I disagree!

 

This statement would only be true if Corey Robinson has trouble throwing a wet or cold football. There will be no mud on the plush Papa John's Stadium carpet. The receivers know where they are going on the wet/snow covered turf while the Lexington Catholic defensive backs do not.

 

I honestly think that a cold/wet field would favor Lone Oak in this one. Especially if their receiving crew has good speed.

Posted
I disagree!

 

This statement would only be true if Corey Robinson has trouble throwing a wet or cold football. There will be no mud on the plush Papa John's Stadium carpet. The receivers know where they are going on the wet/snow covered turf while the Lexington Catholic defensive backs do not.

 

I honestly think that a cold/wet field would favor Lone Oak in this one. Especially if their receiving crew has good speed.

 

No way.

Posted
No way.

 

I agree, even Tom Brady has trouble throwing in poor weather and I believe his recievers are a little better then Lone Oaks.

Posted
I disagree!

 

This statement would only be true if Corey Robinson has trouble throwing a wet or cold football. There will be no mud on the plush Papa John's Stadium carpet. The receivers know where they are going on the wet/snow covered turf while the Lexington Catholic defensive backs do not.

 

I honestly think that a cold/wet field would favor Lone Oak in this one. Especially if their receiving crew has good speed.

 

As long as the ball is dry, a wet surface would help Lone Oak. It would hinder the defensive unit. Lone Oak played well on a wet (natural) field against Fulton City this year.

Posted
Not that familiar with the styles of Trinity & X (except they are very good and probably somewhat balanced)--Who benefits if bad weather hits between these two?

 

Since St. X predominately uses a Run Offensive and Trinity predominately uses a Pass Offensive, I think WET weather (Rain, Sleet or Snow) favors the Tigers. A football is hard enough on a good day to catch, a wet football is even harder.

 

If it is just cold with no precipatation, I think the weather is not a factor for either team.

 

:thumb: GO TIGERS! :thumb:

Posted
Bad weather, more often than not, puts any two teams much more on the same level.

Do you find that to be true on feild turf? I think it might be to a extent depending on the offenses but not as much as it would on a grass field.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...