barrel Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 I would not say De LaSalle was "so superior" then their competition. The run offense forces opponents to play assignment football which works veyr much like a passing game as far as controll. Throughout the thread there has been a good deal of reference to a "balanced" offense but no one has defined what it is. I was using the percentages to see how much passing or running a team had to do for one to consider them balanced. Since it ws being implied that the number of passing or running plays in game defines if a team is balanced or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Birdsfan Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 I think when people talk about "balance" they're not talking about running a certain number of runs or passes per game. They're talking about being proficient in both segments of the offensive gameplan. Without one, you can't do the other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Golfer Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 If you are not balanced in 4A you will not win the title. To be honest with you Trinity is not that balanced. I would say 50% of the time they are in an empty set with no runningbacks and that doesn't count the number of times they throw the football with a runningback in the backfield. We use the word balanced a lot to mean throwing the ball but that's not what it really means. I would not say that Trinity is balanced they are much more of a passing team than a running team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PepRock01 Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 To be honest with you Trinity is not that balanced. I would say 50% of the time they are in an empty set with no runningbacks and that doesn't count the number of times they throw the football with a runningback in the backfield. We use the word balanced a lot to mean throwing the ball but that's not what it really means. I would not say that Trinity is balanced they are much more of a passing team than a running team. The biggest thing though is that they can do both. Ryle couldn't really pass. Trinity could pass AND run. That makes a world of difference. While Trinity may pass more than they run, if a team decides they are going to sell out on stopping the pass we can beat them with the run. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockPride Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 To be honest with you Trinity is not that balanced. I would say 50% of the time they are in an empty set with no runningbacks and that doesn't count the number of times they throw the football with a runningback in the backfield. We use the word balanced a lot to mean throwing the ball but that's not what it really means. I would not say that Trinity is balanced they are much more of a passing team than a running team. Not so fast.... 2000 - 484 rushing attempts, 369 passes 2001 - 432 rushing attempts, 286 passes 2002 - 438 rushing attempts, 354 passes 2003 - 404 rushing attempts, 478 passes 2004 - 387 rushing attempts, 301 passes 2005 - 418 rushing attempts, 344 passes 2006 - 419 rushing attempts, 292 passes That looks pretty balanced to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stickymitts Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 They're all cheaters... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockPride Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barrel Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 There are 3 types of lies. Lies, Lies and Stats. Of those stats on Trinity I would be interested to see what the first half of games stats wise looked liked. QB scrambles of course go down as rushes, as do sacks. When they get a up in a ball game then of course they run the ball more to run out the clock and to keep the score down to a degree. It would be interesting to see the first half stats of the 4A game. I would say that numbers wise, they would be close; but there were 2 huge scrambles in there. A team can be proficient in both areas and still be a run or pass dominate team. There was a few things Ryle could have done to open up their running game without throwing the ball. There are still I am sure a number of other things these teams had in common. Like Did all three win the turnover margin? What was average field position for all three? Were they penalized less often for less yards? Average 1st down yardage gained? All those things play fairly large parts in games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mexitucky Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 They're all cheaters... Takes one to know one:p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Dufrain Posted December 3, 2006 Share Posted December 3, 2006 I can speak for the Breds since they have put the Jumpers out last 2 years but they just don't beat themselves. Very well coached. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts