Page 4 of Originally Posted by Show Stopper I completely understand that but I was just offering a scenario to leatherneck to reduce the number of games if the h... 48 comments | 1659 Views | Go to page 1 →
Apr 7, 11, 04:17 AM #46Some have claimed that the system won't change because it's "all about the money". If true, so what? Shouldn't the universities be concerned about the money? I think they should. Heck, as a taxpayer, I want the state funded universities in Ky to be very, very concerned about the money. With the amount D-1 coaches are paid and with the huge football budgets, the university Presidents better be dang well concerned with choosing the system that generates the most money. I don't understand the it's "all about the money" criticism. I really don't. Have the universities jack up the ticket prices to make up lost revenue, or cut the recruiting budget, or lay off some professors, etc., etc. and we'll again hear it's "all about the money". It's a dang if you do, dang if you don't proposition to me.
Sorry folks, the playoff concept may be more interesting or more fair to some fans, but the Presidents of the state funded universities have a fiduciary duty to go with whatever system they believe will generate the most money for their schools. If that's the current system, so be it.Advertisement
Apr 7, 11, 08:21 AM #47
- Join Date
- Jan 03
- Have love in your heart and an ax in your hand. Hug and swing discriminately- Jim Wendler
Apr 7, 11, 08:51 AM #48
I don't think a 16-team tournament would affect the "meaningfulness" of the regular season. In fact, it could enhance it.
- Join Date
- Nov 04
- 5 Miles from nowhere
1. First, and most importantly, a 16-team field would include everybody. By allowing every conference champion an automatic bid, no team could complain about being left out. The little guys would finally get a fair chance.
2. The fact that there would be only 5 at-large bids would still place a premium on winning games every week and winning your conference championship to ensure you're in.
3. More teams would be in contention so there would be more big games on a weekly basis. A loss wouldn't take you out of the discussion as it does so often with the current setup.
The games would still be huge because winning your conference would still be a premium with only 5 spots left for the rest.
This seems like a really good setup to me.
The majority of the bowls could still be played and a playoff would make them no more meaningless than they already are. They'd be the basketball version of the NIT. Heck, they might could just have a football NIT to boot.
Apr 7, 11, 02:19 PM #49