Jump to content

AFC North Preview - Cleveland Emphasis


Recommended Posts

Peter King of SI was in Cleveland the other day where he gave an interview to Cleveland.com's Mary Kay Cabot. It seems he follows her to stay up-to-date on the Browns. King mentioned he was in Pittsburgh the day before and he asked them about the teams in their division. A couple of guys who have been in Pittsburgh for a long time and who Peter King trusts told him they thought Cleveland was "pretty good". King said because over the last several years a lot of players who are now on the Browns' team were high on the Steelers' draft board. So if Cleveland gets the QB right, they will be hard to beat. He also said we won't know about the QB until the middle of 2019. But Cleveland has been adding a lot of really good players. He thinks Cleveland could be 3-3 in the division this year and predicts 5-11 overall.

 

Cabot asked King if he would have taken Baker Mayfield at #1. He said, "100%." He throws the most accurate ball downfield of all the QBs in the draft. Plus, he likes Mayfield's fire. He has zero problem with what he did at Kansas because the Kansas players wouldn't shake hands at the coin toss. He likes the competitive fire he sees in Mayfield.

 

King also thinks Baltimore is the team to beat in the AFC North. Pittsburgh has major problems on defense and they have major concerns over Leveon Bell. He doesn't think the Bengals are much of a threat in the division. And he says Flacco is better than he has ever seen him. He thinks having Lamar Jackson in camp has lit a fire under Flacco so that he is better prepared than he has been in recent years.

 

A couple of my own comments: Cleveland has a solid O-line but the retirement of Joe Thomas at LT is creating a problem. They tried to draft a guy to fill that role (kinda). But after the early preseason and the beginning of training camp they have decided to move their Pro Bowl Left Guard, Joel Bitonio, to LT, put a rookie at LG, and now RG Kevin Zeitler is injured (calf). If the Browns can figure out their LT and Zeitler comes back 100% healthy from his injury, the offense should be much improved this year. Great backfield with Carlos Hyde, the rookie Chubb, and Duke Johnson. WR core is missing Josh Gordon but still should be much improved. Defense has been improving over last couple of years and now added terrific CB from OSU, Ward.

 

Here's a link to the Peter King interview. Give it a couple of minutes until they introduce King for the interview.

Peter King joins us with a Browns' prediction, what the Steelers think of them and more: Orange and Brown Talk Podcast | cleveland.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you mean there's more to the AFC North than Cleveland? :ylsuper: You gotta go with what you know.

 

Seriously, I'm counting on other posters to weigh in with a bit of info from other teams. My main intent is to see where people think things will shake out in the AFC North. I thought King's comments regarding Pittsburgh and Baltimore were interesting. His thought that Cleveland could go 3-3 in the division is a bit optimistic in my mind, and he is probably closer on his prediction of their overall record. I'd like to hear what others think about the teams in the AFC North heading into this season.

 

It seems like there is no clearly dominant team and the AFC North title is more up for grabs now than it has been in a long time. The next couple of years could be the weakest years for Pittsburgh and Baltimore so this seems to be the opportune time for an improved Cleveland team. Dorsey has the Browns headed in the right direction and the 2019 and 2020 seasons could mark a significant change in Cleveland's fortunes.

 

Does anyone care to comment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Am I crazy to think that the AFC North will feature 3 teams over .500 and the Browns be 7-9?

 

They should be ecstatic if they can get five wins.

 

The browns quietly have put together a decent team for this upcoming season. I'm a big Baker Mayfield guy. Which I think they could be even better if they played him rather than Tyrod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you mean there's more to the AFC North than Cleveland? :ylsuper: You gotta go with what you know.

 

Seriously, I'm counting on other posters to weigh in with a bit of info from other teams. My main intent is to see where people think things will shake out in the AFC North. I thought King's comments regarding Pittsburgh and Baltimore were interesting. His thought that Cleveland could go 3-3 in the division is a bit optimistic in my mind, and he is probably closer on his prediction of their overall record. I'd like to hear what others think about the teams in the AFC North heading into this season.

 

It seems like there is no clearly dominant team and the AFC North title is more up for grabs now than it has been in a long time. The next couple of years could be the weakest years for Pittsburgh and Baltimore so this seems to be the opportune time for an improved Cleveland team. Dorsey has the Browns headed in the right direction and the 2019 and 2020 seasons could mark a significant change in Cleveland's fortunes.

 

Does anyone care to comment?

 

The Bengals were absolutely pathetic last year. Worst line in football. Average qb at best no run game, all this equaled to worst offense in the league. Defense was on the field all game and by all accounts didn't do bad, but they didn't get quick 3 and outs to help themselves out. Yet with all that said they still managed to win 7 games.

 

So I'm not sure why people are big on the Ravens. If they couldn't beat a bad Bengals team last year to make the playoffs. I dont see it this year. The browns I expect to be much better and to win maybe 2 games in the division. Hopefully none against the Bengals.

 

The Steelers are the top dog until someone in the division knocks them off. Their offense is still one of the best in the nfl, and will win games.

 

I love that the Bengals aren't being looked at to do much. As mentioned they won 7 games last year and they were horrible. I fully expect the line to be better, cant be much worst. The new run scheme I believe fits them better, and I believe Mixon will have a big year. Wr wise should be more dynamic in what they can do. Eifert if he stays healthy is just a plus. Defensively Lawson should be even better in year 2. The Dc is suppose to be more aggressive. And William Jackson who I believe will be a shut down corner will be full time starting now.

 

So if last years horrible team can win 7 games. I do think this years team with the changes can be at least 3 games better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The browns quietly have put together a decent team for this upcoming season. I'm a big Baker Mayfield guy. Which I think they could be even better if they played him rather than Tyrod.

I think they’re going to score points no matter who the QB is. I’m high on Mayfield too but for one year I’m not sure he gives you more than Tyrod. I love their receiving core especially when Josh Gordon comes back from whatever it is holding him out of camp. Carlos Hyde and Duke Johnson are a pretty good backfield. Still unsure about the O line, but skill position wise the Browns have made some really good moves. The defense should be better as well just because the young guys are another year more experienced. Going to Cleveland this year is not going to be easy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
If the Browns would have beat the Steelers the first game of the year instead of tying. The Browns would be playing the Ravens for the division title this week.

 

tough pill to swallow, but the future for the Browns looks very bright at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.