Jump to content

Russian Lawyer: I did not have Clinton Information.


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

 

The most salient point you make is the bolded statement above. This whole thing represents how much the MSM is grasping at straws to find ANYTHING to taint Trump and how eager they are to jump to conclusions before knowing the story. Put the headline out there and hope the false allegation sticks even when it is proven false--is the modus operandi. So far, there is NOTHING. The Russian attorney had no ties to the Kremlin.

 

I do not like Donald Trump. I hate the MSM. Journalism is no where to be found.

 

Instead of summarizing an interview/news story in a way that is as anti-Trump as possible, for once I'd like to hear one of these news anchors say, "We thought we had something here with this story but there was no substance to the allegation."

That would be honest journalism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the article:

 

"It is quite possible that maybe they were longing for such an information. They wanted it so badly that they could only hear the thought that they wanted.”

 

So Jr. , Kushner, and Manafort (Ukrainian foreign agent) were trying to collude, but the lawyer lied to them about what she had. :lol2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overall, the concern should be the intent of those around President Trump. But, no one is concerned about that. All this wailing and gnashing of teeth by those who are his apostles is simply to distract from the issue of what these people intended.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't understand why folks on the left are so concerned about Trump and Russia.. Yet no concern by the collusion and obstruction of your own party, which has actually rigged a national election...

 

I don't know if I'm left, right or center but I'm sick of the whole thing from every side. We've become a three ring circus to the world and the clowns are running the shows rather than the ring master. Just my take. :irked:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if I'm left, right or center but I'm sick of the whole thing from every side. We've become a three ring circus to the world and the clowns are running the shows rather than the ring master. Just my take. :irked:

 

How many years have we complained about career politicians that have no real world experience? The country was on a path of European style multi nationalism and globalisation , expanding socialism and political disenfranchisement of large portions of the citizen population. Trump was elected as a change agent. Change is bloody. Change is threatening to many powerful segments of society. You see that by the resistance to Trump from MSM , its backers, and political opponents in both parties.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many years have we complained about career politicians that have no real world experience? The country was on a path of European style multi nationalism and globalisation , expanding socialism and political disenfranchisement of large portions of the citizen population. Trump was elected as a change agent. Change is bloody. Change is threatening to many powerful segments of society. You see that by the resistance to Trump from MSM , its backers, and political opponents in both parties.

 

I concur with that thought.

 

Of course I've seen a lot of blood letting regardless of who is President.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Overall, the concern should be the intent of those around President Trump. But, no one is concerned about that. All this wailing and gnashing of teeth by those who are his apostles is simply to distract from the issue of what these people intended.

The intent was to get information to the electorate about the opponent that had not been released or known yet...that's the intent of every Presidential Election Campaign.

 

Do you not think Clinton's people would have and did meet with every single person they could to get secrets/dirt on Trump?

 

Very naive if you think both parties would not run over their own mother to get dirt on the other side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The intent was to get information to the electorate about the opponent that had not been released or known yet...that's the intent of every Presidential Election Campaign.

 

Do you not think Clinton's people would have and did meet with every single person they could to get secrets/dirt on Trump?

 

Very naive if you think both parties would not run over their own mother to get dirt on the other side.

 

I'm addressing only the current administration. I belive it's well established that the other party has done the same. I am focused only on what is occurring.by the current administration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I concur with that thought.

 

Of course I've seen a lot of blood letting regardless of who is President.

 

Not like this POTUS. The right did not have this much passion regarding Bill Clinton. The left likes to focus on Trump's personal flaws, but it is his politics that threatens them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.