Jump to content

CatPride24

10 Post Members
  • Posts

    471
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Reputation

10 Good
  1. Holmes should be embarrassed. No, not for running up the score on Lloyd, but for their high pressure defense giving up 48 points to the Juggernauts. That is right at Lloyds season average. I expected more from Holmes. They better pick up the "D" if they are going to compete with Highlands and Holy Cross in the post season.
  2. Why is it any of the MS principals business. He doesn't own the rights to your daughter. If the HS coach, AD, and Principal are fine with it, and you are fine with it, and your daughter is fine with it, screw him. He can't tell you what to do with your daughter after school hours. What if he were opposed to Girl Scouts because he wanted all of his students to belong to 4H? It's extra curricular.
  3. How many schools do not allow kids to move up? Is Highlands the only one now that Boone Co schools are allowed?
  4. Oooooo. Guy I work with used to work for NSR. According to him it was over priced and under effective.....sorry had to squish your plug.
  5. What are you talking about. No one in this entire thread put down any kid about anything. For some reason you and Budman have it in your mind that Shining Stars has been slighted and that is not the case. Please go back and reread the thread. This is about the talent level of kids and where they end up playing college ball based on their talent. Geez. It's people like you who take all the fun out of message boards.
  6. Not sure why your perception is that shots were being taken at the Shining Stars program. I think the point was that just because a player plays at NCAA DIII level that does not mean they are an inferior player or not as good as a DI player. I'm sure there are a lot of DI and DII programs that would want nothing to do with Thomas More this season. A lot goes into where a player chooses to play college ball; talent, exposure, proximity to home, choice of major. Go back and read the thread and you'll see that you are saying the same thing I am.
  7. That's a given, thus the comparison between Neace and Kiernan. They can both walk the walk. The difference in their exposure was their AAU Teams.
  8. So if she did, and she turned them down to go to a better academic school like TMC. Kudos to her. Still doesn't change the fact that the exposure provided by different AAU teams has different results. Look at it over time. The proof is in the pudding. It is not about talent, it's about exposure.
  9. I'm sure they were aware of her, perhaps she just wasn't what they needed at the time. But I'm sure that if she would have been given the exposure Neace received she would have been offered a paying scholarship somewhere. Some AAU teams are just better at getting their players seen and recruited at certain levels than others. The Shining Stars do a great job of placing their kids at the NCAA DIII level. But I can't recall any Shining Stars players going on to the DI or DIi level. Cincy heat, Ky Premiere, seem to do it every year. My point is the scholarship level is more about AAU exposure than talent.
  10. Not even close. Look at Nicole Kiernan (now playing at NCAA DIII Thomas More) and Savannah Neace (committed to play at NCAA DI Kent State). Both play the same position. Is Neace the better player because she will play DI? I say It's all about AAU and exposure. Kiernan played for the Shining Stars, while Neace played across the river for the Cincy Heat. 'Nough said.
  11. Everyone is wondering the same thing, they are just too timid to say anything. Or they'rewondering if daddy will interfere as much at the next level as he did in hs. So please share your thoughts
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.