futurecoach

Tab Content
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 16, 17, 03:51 PM
    Haha I think it could end up being the Bengals or Chargers.
    17 replies | 361 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 16, 17, 03:50 PM
    Honestly the St. Louis area is the area that scares me as an area the Bengals could move too. That area imo will get another team one day if they come to terms of building a stadium. I think the Chargers and Bengals would be two of the possibilities to end up there.
    17 replies | 361 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 16, 17, 03:48 PM
    If you are not a fan of the Bengals I can understand people saying good riddance. However if you are a fan of the Bengals, no matter what you think of Mike Brown. I have no idea how or why someone would say yes please move. Maybe we are spoiled because most of have basically had a professional nfl team right by us. However all I know is I would much rather have a bad nfl team right by me, than no nfl team at all. What's next will people say...
    17 replies | 361 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 16, 17, 01:27 PM
    Osu should beat Michigan handily, they aren't that good and have beat no one. Wisconsin's best win is against a 4 loss team who only got ranked because osu sucked so bad and they blew them out. So no I don't think osu should get rewarded for winning a conference with a bunch of teams who also really haven't done anything or beat anyone. Especially when not only did they lose osu got manhandled twice. So I do hope the committee remembers last...
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 16, 17, 11:17 AM
    They have also said it's job is to get the 4 best teams. There is no way to justify a team with two blow out losses including one to a 4 loss team, is one of the top 4 teams even if they win the big 10. The only thing that shows is maybe the big 10 as a whole was down. When two of Ohio States best wins who would be over two teams in Penn State and Wisconsin that literally have zero good wins and is the reason why their record is what it is. So...
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 16, 17, 12:02 AM
    That is where you are wrong. Those teams wouldn't be as undeserving as osu even if osu wins the big 10. If OSU wins the big 10 it just shows how down the big 10 may have been that a team who got blown out twice won the big 10. A team who decides not to show up twice in one season and gets blown out in both does not make them more deserving. As for USC and Washington state you just gave a great example of why the committee loves osu. You are...
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 11:03 PM
    If it was 8 teams I would have zero problem with osu making it for winning their conference. With it being 4 teams I do have a problem if osu makes it over a few other 2 loss teams. Yes other teams have had losses to bad teams. But none of them took a complete beat down to a 4 loss team. If we want to say the regular season means something. Then no way imo can people say a team who took two beat downs is one of the top 4 teams who deserves it....
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 10:57 PM
    Agreed on all of that.
    56 replies | 291 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 02:19 PM
    It would seriously be like Bama getting blown out by UK this year.
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 02:17 PM
    So it's ok for you to suggest Clemson is only where they are because of love for Clemson. But it's not ok to say that about OSU? Ok then lol
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 02:16 PM
    Yes the path is obvious. We just doubt you be so fine with that path being given. Especially with your Bama envy, I bet you would talk about the committee's love for Bama. Or how the rubric should change if Bama has such a clear path with 2 blow out losses. That would be like Bama getting blown out by UK...
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 02:13 PM
    Exactly so #theohiostatecommitee
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 02:11 PM
    It would be if they didn't have 2 blow out losses. In fact it probably be fine with just one blow out loss, because we have seen a big number of good teams blown out this year in a game. However it wasn't just one blow out loss. It was 2 and one was against a 4 loss Iowa. The same Iowa that Wisconsin beat pretty easily.
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 02:09 PM
    Based off your previous post about Bama, I disagree. Or you would be saying the rubric needs changed if Bama can make it after 2 blow outs.
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 01:31 PM
    Haha I seriously doubt you would be saying well it sucks but it makes sense because of the rubric. It probably would be more like how is Bama still have a shot after getting blown out twice and one of those being to a 4 loss team. It's obviously favoritism and committee just loves Bama and Saban. I feel like that would be more of the response we would get. Hence why I say it's funny when an osu fan complains about the committee loving a team.
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 01:21 PM
    Just imagine if that was Bama or Clemson who got blown out twice but looked like they still may control their fate by winning out. I doubt he would be talking about the rubric anymore lol #theohiostatecommitee
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 01:08 PM
    The committee loves osu. Just like as you say they love Clemson. #theohiostatecommitee
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 12:14 PM
    Ok good deal. So a 1 loss Wisconsin even if that one loss comes in the big 10 championship to osu. Still should be in the playoff over a 2 loss osu team who wins the big 10. Because since they followed the rubric last year it put osu in. Then that means Wisconsin should be in, since it's following the rubric and precedent it set. Unless the committee continues to show love for osu as they usually do...
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 11:56 AM
    Very true it will be fun. However I don't think the osu Michigan game will be close. Michigan is not that good of a team this year and has zero offense.
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 11:53 AM
    It's also very simple the key is to get the 4 best teams correct? A 2 loss OSU would not deserve to be in over a 2 loss Clemson, a 1 lost Miami, a 2 loss Notre Dame, a 2 loss USC, or shoot even over a 1 loss Wisconsin. Even if Osu beats them and wins the big 10. As we seen last year they put a 1 lost osu over a 2 loss Penn State who won the big 10 and beat osu. So yes that would be showing love for osu. Especially if it's a close game Wisconsin...
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 11:11 AM
    Yes they are clearing a path for them. The teams in front of them all almost all play each other. So unless as we said Bama loses. All osu has to do is win out. If Bama wins out Auburn will be out, and Georgia out. Georgia would have two losses them and equal quality wins as osu, but losses to better teams. Yet they would put a two lost osu team over them before they put 2 sec teams in especially one with 2 losses. Clemson and Miami are going to...
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 10:48 AM
    It's always funny hearing an osu fan complaining about the committee love for Clemson. When osu has benefited the most from any team in the country since the playoffs has started, with the committee's love for osu. Osu has already received the benefit of doubt in both years they made it, when their was decent arguments for other teams. Now the committee has given osu a clear path to make it again even though they have two blow out losses. One of...
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 10:03 AM
    The it factor is basically included into it as I stated in the post above that I meant to also quote you on. That's why I think the qbr is such a great stat to use to evaluate how effective a qb really is.
    34 replies | 373 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 10:02 AM
    It does take into account clutch plays and situations, and making a play in tough situations. Leading a game winning td drive gets the qb higher points than a td drive at the end when the game is already out of reach. So yes in that instance the "it" factor is kind of included because making those important big time plays does score higher.
    34 replies | 373 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 15, 17, 12:23 AM
    Overall I liked what I seen. Lots to improve on obviously. But I believe this team has the makeup to be a very dangerous team when and if Vanderbilt and Baker start playing. Vanderbilt could be like a point forward for us, and Baker would add that shooting we need.
    44 replies | 1359 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 14, 17, 11:24 PM
    It would be interesting if Highlands decides to drop down to 4A. However I don't think they will because Covcath will be 5A. Even with all the years of defeats Covcath had to Highlands. Covcath never decided to say hey let's try to get away from those guys because they are to good for us. When Highlands has petitioned to move to 5A Covath did to. Then they both went back down to 4a, and then last realignment both asked to move up. Covcath never...
    77 replies | 5999 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 14, 17, 11:14 PM
    Why not? I don't think it would be by a couple of scores as he stated. But I do think it would be a toss up game.
    57 replies | 3049 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 14, 17, 09:59 PM
    My question is why should a 2 lost big 10 champ in osu be in over a 1 lost Wisconsin as long as it's a close game in the big 10 championship? The committee set a precedent last year putting a 1 lost team in over the big 10 champ even though that big 10 champ in psu had beat osu. Which osu only had 2 good wins last year yet they still put them in over a 2 lost big 10 champ. So very close to same scenario. So if they go by what they did last year,...
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 14, 17, 09:55 PM
    Then makes even less sense that osu moved up. Since their blow out lost to a now 4 loss Iowa looks even worst now. It's crazy osu not only has 2 losses bit 2 losses that they were flat out dominated in. Yet they may control their destiny. I don't want to hear osu fans ever complain about people being out against them. Any other team that has that happen to them wouldn't be in the top 10. Shoot USC has a similar resume as osu, but they only...
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
  • futurecoach's Avatar
    Nov 14, 17, 09:48 PM
    Agreed. If Auburn beats Bama then osu has no chance to make the playoffs. At this moment even a 1 lost Bama will make it. So if Bama were to lose to Auburn. Then either a 2 lost Auburn or 1 lost Georgia would make it after winning the sec championship. That would put 2 sec teams in. As you said you need Bama to win out.
    143 replies | 789 view(s)
More Activity
About futurecoach

Basic Information

About futurecoach
Location:
WHO DEY!!!

Statistics


Total Posts
Total Posts
19,587
Posts Per Day
4.20
Last Post
Bengals Leave Cincinnati? Nov 16, 17 03:51 PM
General Information
Last Activity
Today 09:23 AM
Join Date
Feb 9, 05

Nov 14, 17


Nov 4, 17


Oct 31, 17


Oct 28, 17


Oct 22, 17


Oct 16, 17


Oct 13, 17


Oct 11, 17


Oct 2, 17


Sep 14, 17


Aug 21, 17


Aug 11, 17


Aug 10, 17


No results to display...

Nov 16, 17


Nov 15, 17




Nov 17, 17


Nov 15, 17


Nov 14, 17


Nov 11, 17


Nov 10, 17


Nov 8, 17


Nov 7, 17



Top